Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
Channels Astrology | Cricket | Tenders | Classified | Blogs | Shopping | Opinions | Hotel| Travel
You are here: IE »   Story » Comment »

1984 Sikh carnage was wrong: Rahul

Amritsar, November 18: Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi condemned the anti-Sikh violence in the aftermath of Indira Gandhi’s assassination, saying “whatever happened was wrong”. “The 1984 riots were wrong. I strongly condemn the carnage,” Rahul said at a news conference in response to a question on Operation B  ....Read more

Comments
Post comment
52 Comments |
1984 sikh riotsBy: surjit Chowdhary | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 11:24:48 AM Reply | Forward as you agree,it was wrong then why congress party is still keeping the people responsible in the party.when accused time and again by eye witnesses,they should have resigned from the party,or party should have suspended from party.These crimnals are given security by the government whereas people who suffered have not been compensated or given a fair trial todate.People have feeling that these people should not be part of congress, if congress wants to become clean.can only be done by kicking these culprts out,and putting the the cream on the wounds of Sikhs. Sikhs are the only people ,who sacrifce their lives most ( in percentage for the nation.
Rahul Retire and save our country if you are a IndianBy: KUMAR | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 11:11:13 AM Reply | Forward It will be good if his family retires from politics in India and do some social work it is the family that has brought this country to this low level . The people of India will be grateful if this happens .
BacchaBy: Suresh Iyer | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 11:03:43 AM Reply | Forward One of the previlages given to the Nehru gandhi dynasty is that they need not take part in any public debate with political opponents.Their true colors will be out in such a case and all their perceived abilities will be exposed to the skin.From time to time they come up with sentimental issues like Sikh massacre,partition, Babri masjid with scripts written by unknown hands.Their election speeches are written by experts and have sometimes landed them in trouble because they themselves do not know the implications of some contents.It is like a corporate house where for them all their jobs are outsourced and their only investment is the dynasty name.They will only occupy the seat of power. In the case of sikh massacre, our respected PM had during his only lok sabha election tried to sell the involvement of RSS in the riots.The sikhs were shocked beyond belief to hear the allegation and a promising election turned out to be a disaster for him.
Bacha defeated BuddaBy: Mathew | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 10:41:10 AM Reply | Forward Beware Mr. Rajnath....Bacha defeated Budda in US... It can happen in India too..
budda??By: Prasad | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 12:54:48 PM Reply | Forward what is the age of OBAMA?.. relax man..
Age ??By: Vijay | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 14:11:54 PM Reply | Forward Is age the only criteria..then I would look for PM post too..
trying to wake up from sleepBy: Saurabh | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 10:36:21 AM Reply | Forward Cummon Mr Gandhi, wat u wanna say by regretting sikh carnage now which ur fatherhas patronized, seconly if u r not child wat u r, u use ur fathers name every than and now in election rallies, my suggestion to u is that please demand vote on the things your party has done and not in the name of Gandhi
Rahul The liarBy: Nanda | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 10:22:34 AM Reply | Forward After 24 years this man Rahul Gandhi accepts that the 1984 riots against the sikhs was a mistake and condems it most of the leaders who were convicted in the 1984 riots are still in the congress party holding big posts what is that Mr Rahul is going to do for that?It is an Election Gimmick people dont believe he accepts the mistake after 24 years you can imagine what kind of a politician he is??????
Stop being hypocritical like your party Rahul....By: Vikas Bhatt | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 10:20:34 AM Reply | Forward Why doesn't Congress-UPA also do some self introspection? Why are people rejected by voters like Arjun Singh and Shivraj given portfolios to play with the lives, security of citizens where terrorism is concerned and also where futures of youth is concerned? Why is UPA and Congress giving clean chits to SIMI and supporting Muslim terrorists caught in Delhi? Why is Congress not ready to accept Islamic terrorism and yet goes all out to tarnish Hindus by calling them terrorists and Muslims as victims? Why does PM lsoe sleep when a muslim from India is caught in Aus and yet sleeps peacfully when a Sadhvi is totured by ATS? Why do Congressi netas take protests to protest Danish cartoons to appease muslims but stay silent when their UPA allies like Karat, Bardhan and Karuna abuse Lord Rama openly?
Facts please ...By: Indian | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 11:13:52 AM Reply | Forward You got some facts wrong. Cong has not given clean chit to SIMI nor has it supported muslim terrorists. They have extended the ban on SIMI, killed 2 muslims in an encounter and caught scores of them in Delhi, UP and Maharashtra. No cong leader has defended any terror suspect unlike the BJP which has already given a clean chit to all the Malegaon suspects. BJP was also soft on terrorists - remember Mohd Azhar (Advaniji does not remember). The cong has many negatives but lets not be partial when looking at facts.
More facts......By: Vikas Bhatt | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 13:46:40 PM Reply | Forward The only reason they have backed publicly the arrested suspects is because again Congress-UPA showed the way by backing those arrested from Delhi and by questioning the death of MC Sharma, the Delhi top cop all for the sake of Muslim votebank. Why are Arjun Singh and Amar Singh allowed to give legal help to those arrested from Delhi? So why should Hindus caught be denied the same legal help and public support now? Why are Muslims defending those Delhi terrorists by calling them 'innocent students'? Isn't it for the courts to decide? Also Azhar Masood was freed bacause 180 Indian lives needed saving at Kandahar. Congress leaders led the dharnas then to free the terrorists outside Vajpayee's office. How many lives did Congress save when Khalistani terrorists hijacked and blw up Air India planes? Study facts first if you are truely 'Indian'...
Regarding BJP-Malegaon....By: Vikas Bhatt | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 13:45:13 PM Reply | Forward The only reason they have backed publicly the arrested suspects is because again Congress-UPA showed the way by backing those arrested from Delhi and by questioning the death of MC Sharma, the Delhi top cop all for the sake of Muslim votebank. Why are Arjun Singh and Amar Singh allowed to give legal help to those arrested from Delhi? So why should Hindus caught be denied the same legal help and public support now? Why are Muslims defending those Delhi terrorists by calling them 'innocent students'? Isn't it for the courts to decide? Also Azhar Masood was freed bacause 180 Indian lives needed saving at Kandahar. Congress leaders led the dharnas then to free the terrorists outside Vajpayee's office. How many lives did Congress save when Khalistani terrorists hijacked and blw up Air India planes? Study facts first if you are truely 'Indian'...
Facts are.....By: Vikas Bhatt | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 13:39:59 PM Reply | Forward Fact is when Puppet PM irst took his post, his first mission was to lift ban on SIMI but State pressures from other CM made him abort the attempt. Fact is Arjun Singh is allowing Jamia Millia to defend the Delhi terrorists. Fact is many Congress Muslim leaders are demanding a judicial enquiry in the encounter. I have mentioned both UPA-Congress in my post so ppl like Laloo, Amar, Mulayam who gave clean chits to SIMI earlier are included. Fact is Congress Leader in UP Salman Khurshid filed a petition in SC for lifting the ban on SIMI 2 years back. Anymore evidence needed?
FactsBy: Akash | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 17:24:15 PM Reply | Forward Fact is also that the PM has reject such requests.
Gandhis are used to sacrifice for countryBy: real bharatiya | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 9:59:52 AM Reply | Forward Great ! ! Rahul, such statements only can be given if one is grown under great morals of life. Gandhis are used to sacrifice for the nation.sangh
sacrificeBy: T.Jayaprakash | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 14:24:29 PM Reply | Forward Nehru dynasty sacrifices for the country are listed below1.Indira Gandhi planted a monster called Bhindranvale in punjab to counter Akalis. The monster grew up and swallowed her.2. Rajiv Gandhi sent indian forces to Sri Lanka on the pretext of saving tamils and to boost the congress chances in a TamilNadu state election.He lost the election as well as his life.Both these are considered sacrifice to the nation.Sacrifice for power would be more appropriate.
Nehru/Ghandi dynastyBy: venkat | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 16:24:52 PM Reply | Forward Nehru Dynasty's so called "sacrifice" cost us too much - India is spending about Rs.1000 crores on the security of Nehru/Ghandi family's security alone. Leave other matters like destruction of democracy, judiciary etc.
Congress, a curse on BharatBy: Bharatiya | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 13:38:17 PM Reply | Forward Congress culture and great morals!??? From Nehru to Rahul, the entire clan is anti-Bharatiya. Nehru divided Bharat into Hindu-muslim votebank, Indira butchered Sikhs, Rajiv kept his wife as Italian citizen until he wanted to be PM. Sonia protected Quattorochi and now Rahul is showing off by living with poor Bharatiyas for the weekend experience. This is the family's culture!
Thank godBy: sagar | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 9:45:02 AM Reply | Forward At lest " Youvaraj" of India remebers the Sikh carnage year !!!!
ApologiseBy: Shuba | Wednesday , 19 Nov '08 9:40:34 AM Reply | Forward Congress should apologise also and punish the guilties of the crime
PreviousNext1234
Post a Comment
Name:
Email:
Title:
Maximum characters allowed     
Comment:
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.