Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
Channels Astrology | Cricket | Tenders | Classified | Blogs | Shopping | Opinions | Hotel| Travel
You are here: IE »   Story » Comment »

A clincher?

The phrases and code-words of India-Pakistan dialogue had become so familiar that departures in the joint statement out of Sharm El-Sheikh have instantly invited clarifications. A reading of the text of the joint statement issued after Thursday’s meeting between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh an  ....Read more

Comments
Post comment
3 Comments |
Joint StatementBy: Dr. Ram Chander Sharma | Friday , 17 Jul '09 14:59:46 PM Reply | Forward Divided families may meet again and in the process on Indo Pak relations the meaning of a dialogue is not just sitting across the table, but to resolve the six decade old issues. Well the Pakistan Govt seems to be a puppet and having no control over the jihadi terrorism unleashed all over Pakistan but India may not loose any stretegy to deal with the terrorism. The statement on Bloachistan is not a diplomatic but a well chosen move to keep both the windows open peace as well as threat. India should continue composite dialogue process.
India and BalochistanBy: Rajesh Vyas | Friday , 17 Jul '09 12:40:43 PM Reply | Forward How is India concerned with what is going on in Balochistan? It is an internal matter of Pakistan and they have to handle it. Why was a reference made to Balochistan in these futile talks between Manmohan and Gilani? Umpteen such meetings have taken place between the Pakistani and Indian heads of states but no result has emerged. Both the Governments in their respective countries are fooling their own people. While it may ne OKAY for the Pakistani Leadership to do this, India is a democratic Country and we demand explanations from the Prime Minister for this statement on Balochistan. Why are we not able to tell Pakistan that ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!! Are we under pressure from the USA to resume talks with the ever hostile neighbour? If so, what do we get in return from the USA? The Government must come clean on this. The inclusion of Balochistan business is once again an utter failure of Indian Foreign Poicy and Indian Diplomacy.
Some historical factoidsBy: Devasahayan | Friday , 17 Jul '09 21:24:52 PM Reply | Forward By your logic Rajesh, it could have been said in 1971 that Bangladesh crisis was "internal matter of Pakistan to handle"--but it proved otherwise, when refugees came across border and then Pak troops followed to massacre them. BTW, the reason for 1965 War was because Pakistan wanted to divert attention from its atrocities in Balochistan.
Post a Comment
Name:
Email:
Title:
Maximum characters allowed     
Comment:
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.