Indianexpress.com : comments : Guj HC judge declines to hear petition against SIT probe

Guj HC judge declines to hear petition against SIT probe

Ahmedabad: The Gujarat High Court judge hearing the petition challenging the probe by special investigation team (SIT) against Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and 62 others, on Monday declined from hearing the case. When the matter came up for hearing in the court of Justice H N Devani she said, "not ....Read more

Comments

Post comment

8 Comments |

Sometimes average people need to do a little research...By: Jai Hind | Friday , 10 Jul '09 10:39:04 AM Reply | Forward We fail to understand why a judge would refuse a hearing. Think of the following situations:In this case maybe there are several accused who maybe not be guilty.If the judge knows even one person out of the several accused due to personal reasons he/she may not decide on the case as it would only be read as "biased" judgement.

No difference between Pakistani Judges and Gujrath Judges, both work under the directives of fanatics.By: SHAME ON TAX EVADING GUJRATHI BUSINESSMEN | Tuesday , 7 Jul '09 11:12:14 AM Reply | Forward The atmosphere in Gujrath, even after 9 years is not peaceful.Modi the butcher has taken over complete control og Judiciary,Executive and legislation.If the central govt. is serious in punishing the guilty, then MODI shall be arrested and a free and fair trail shall eb conducted.These RSS/BJP/VHP GOONS HAVE COMMITTED THE MOST HEINOUS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, INIDA WILL NEVER PROGRESS UNLESS JUSTICE IS METED OUT TO THE VICTIMS, NOT JUST GUJARATA, BUT IN ALLTHE CASES WHICH ARE INFLUENCED BY PSEUDO HINDUTVADI MORONS.

Guj HC judge declines to hear petition against SIT probeBy: darvan | Tuesday , 7 Jul '09 9:09:07 AM Reply | Forward Trivialisation of justice comes to mind here.How could a judge pick and choose his/her brief? Isnt she duty bound to hear the case or admit her involvement in the case.No wonder Pakistani Judge is dithering on Mumbai terrorists. Isnt there a superior authority to intervene and suspend the judge for complcity? Her behavior indicts her to involvment in the case which she must be disclose or be sacked. Getting away like this is a mockery of justice

INCREDIBLE!By: Vinod Dawda | Tuesday , 7 Jul '09 5:16:03 AM Reply | Forward The whole exercise of SIT smacks of political vendetta. The whole tragedy has had so many bodies spending a fortune from the taxpayers (including the relatives of those killed), that it is hard to see any more meaningful outcome. The whole saga is mired by mindless media frenzy and political dance. Even if one assumes a degree of reluctance by the political machinery to act fast enough it is not hard to see that the process was largely a mob frenzy which would have been hard to handle even with the best equipped forces of a richer and developed country. It may be argued that the Hindus should not have been angered after some sixty of them got burnt alive. Hindus should have shown their legendary ability to bow down against any form of violence. It is sad that the government spent more resources on scapegoats and mudslinging rather than the victims. The legal system that allows such a sequence of drama can not be considered fair or capable of delivering justice when faced with best liars and lawyers.Time to change and move forward.

Do the judges have the right to pick and chose cases they could hear in their court?By: Hary Nambiar | Monday , 6 Jul '09 23:02:21 PM Reply | Forward Refusal to hear the case by the Judge is absurd. Do the judge have the right to pick and chose cases they could hear in their court?

criminal guiltBy: khanna shree | Monday , 6 Jul '09 18:26:42 PM Reply | Forward this persons action makes it clear he is the criminal and trying to find loop holes and mockery of the indian judiciary system, so shall you sow so shall you reap mr killer MLA

Fearless atmosphere is an important issue in any investigationBy: Dr. Divyesh Raythatha | Monday , 6 Jul '09 17:28:46 PM Reply | Forward An average person fails to understand the meaning of declining to hear the matter for pesonal reasons.

Juggling with words and terminology to dealy justiceBy: dermarasa | Monday , 6 Jul '09 15:46:57 PM Reply | Forward lawyers and judges can juggle with words and terminology and fool the people and delay justice this is one way of showing their hiding their prejudice.babri masjid commission took seventeen years and Mr Modi's case will take 27 years and by that time he will have become the PM of India