Indianexpress.com : comments : Sheikh gave Jacko over $1m even before they had met

You are here: IE » Story » Comment »

Sheikh gave Jacko over $1m even before they had met

London, November 21: : Sheikh Adbulla of Bahrain has told the High Court that he gave Michael Jackson over 676,000 pounds before he had even met the singer. Sheikh Abdulla bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the second son of the King of Bahrain, is suing Jackson to get back what he says he spent on the star in a failed recording ....Read more

Comments

Post comment

3 Comments |

Powerless brainless ArabsBy: jigna | Monday , 24 Nov '08 9:07:18 AM Reply | Forward Now we know why Jackson has embraced Islam. It is a known fact, this forced conversion fetches you a lot of mullah. Right? You brainless oil headed stinky Arabs.Fight your own battles and wars why do you call people to fight for you. Stop wearing these stupid gowns dress us like men to be men and fight your neighbors.You can't show your muscles with money, show your common sense too.

This Sheiks have lot of moneyBy: Raj | Friday , 21 Nov '08 20:50:58 PM Reply | Forward These Sheikhs have all the preto dollors. They do not know what to do with it. This particualr one is better actually. At least he did not donate it to extremists to buy bombs and guns.

How brainless?By: salam | Friday , 21 Nov '08 19:04:13 PM Reply | Forward Why did the sheikh spent money on jackson? It is the shiekh's fault. This is what happens when your intention is the live life for the sake of this fake world. The money could have fed so many hungry and sick in this world. What a shame. How this sheikh blew up his money for something which has no reward in this life or hereafter.

Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Title:

Maximum characters allowed

Comment:

TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).

I agree to the terms of use.