Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story » Comment »

Sonia holds meeting on internal security, Patil absent

New Delhi, September 15:: Congress President Sonia Gandhi on Monday reviewed the country's internal security situation with senior party leaders but significantly Home Minister Shivraj Patil, who is under attack from various quarters over the handling of terrorism, was conspicuous by his absence. External Affairs Minist  ....Read more

congrutlation your C.M.DELHIBy: mohammed | Saturday , 13 Dec '08 15:40:59 PM Reply | Forward EID MUBARAK EID MUBARAK i like to you and with your family i want every time you came for post c.m. so all pepole happy i want also palase in congres win i request from allah
Sonia's meetingBy: Ramesh | Tuesday , 16 Sep '08 7:20:26 AM Reply | Forward What is use of meetings held by Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh? These people with Maulana Mulayam Singh, Shaikh Lalu, and Kahan Arjun Singh and eunuch Shivraj patil have perpetuated militancy. They have repealed POTA.
Sonia holding security meetingBy: A. Pradeep | Tuesday , 16 Sep '08 7:07:29 AM Reply | Forward Chill out guys. The only reason Soniaji held the meeting is because your Sardar PM doesn't know what to do. The only subject he passed in school was Economics and Home Science.
Sonia meeting!By: Dod | Tuesday , 16 Sep '08 4:47:15 AM Reply | Forward She is not even acting anymore, is she? Everybody know that she would be ruling us, now we have the proof. What else do we need? I did not expect this from Manmohan Singh. He is Prime Minister in name only. He has also turned out to be the PM without any backbone and a Congress Yesman!!!
delhiBy: dharma | Monday , 15 Sep '08 22:19:15 PM Reply | Forward WHERE IS THE PRIME MINISTER IS HE DEAD? WHY IS A PARTY LEADER, SONIA HOLDS A MEETING? DO YOU INDIANS, INDIAN REPORTERS, JOURNALISTS HAVE ANY BRAIN OR BACKBONE OR COURAGE ? DONT YOU QUESTION ANY OF THIS? DONT YOU ALL KNOW WHAHT OR WRONG? THEY VOTE FOR CONGRESS, THEY DESERVE WHAT THEY ARE GETTING NOW IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM. IT WAS THE PEOPLE OF BHARAT WELCOMED PEOPLE OF ALL RELIGIONS, NOW TODAY THEY ARE GETTING BUTCHERED BECAUSE THEY ARE HINDUS BY THE OWN PEOPLE WHOM THEY SHELTERED. ISLAM, CHRISTIANIY WANT TO ENSLAVE OTHERS IN THE NAME OF GOD. WHAT THEY DONT REALIZED IS GOD IS ONE, WE ARE ALL UNDER ONE GOD! THIS IS A SICK WORLD WE LIVE IN WITH LOT OF SELF CENTERED , IGNORANT PEOPLE. ONLY GOD CAN HELP THIS WORLD!
Abdication of Responsibility!!By: G. Din | Monday , 15 Sep '08 20:18:53 PM Reply | Forward "Sonia holds meeting on internal security". Why? Is the Prime Minister of India dead? When did he die, that a semi-literate Italian "ayah" takes it upon herself to handle the burden of India's national security!!! How shameful! Never thought we will have to see this day! The Government of India has abdicated its most fundamental and basic responsibility towards the nation - providing security. And now any foreigner Jane is emboldened to insult the nation by circumventing its elected representatives! How utterly shameful and disgraceful!
advani loves to drive hindoos to kill muslims and christiansBy: anil bharali | Monday , 15 Sep '08 20:05:43 PM Reply | Forward in our country, it is repeatedly happening that in name of religion polticians are arousing cruel animal instinct within people. tt is unfortunate religious headsof the society are silently enjoying it. govt. is passive in action.it isa very very ugly and painful moment for the nation.
Sati in hinduismBy: hindism guru | Monday , 15 Sep '08 20:05:37 PM Reply | Forward LET THESE WOMEN, WHOSE HUSBANDS ARE WORTHY AND ARE LIVING, ENTER THE HOUSE WITH GHEE (APPLIED) AS COLLYRIUM (TO THEIR EYES). LET THESE WIVES FIRST STEP INTO THE PYRE, TEARLESS WITHOUT ANY AFFLICTION AND WELL ADORNED.RISE, COME UNTO THE WORLD OF LIFE, O WOMAN COME, HE IS LIFELESS BY WHOSE SIDE THOU LIEST. WIFEHOOD WITH THIS THY HUSBAND WAS THY PORTION, WHO TOOK THY HAND AND WOOED THEE AS A LOVER
HINDU draft OF commom CIVIL code.By: N.Vasisht | Monday , 15 Sep '08 20:05:37 PM Reply | Forward The only way to dominate minorities like sikhs, christians, muslims, jains & bhudist is to force common civil code on them. They talk of widow remarriage - we hindoos will make law to burn all widow women. These minorities talk about making indians human - we hindoos will make it mandatory to drink urine. These minorities talk about equality - we hindoos will make them even lower than sudras. These minorities talk about eating meat - we hindoos will make them eat cow dung. These minorities talk about freedom - we hindoos will make them the third class citizens of india. It it goal of our Hindu rastra to make bhramins the best aryan in world - even better than our brother Hitler. We will make temples in Masjids, Churches, gurudwaras. These is the country of Aryans - and no one else can dominate here but us!
Krishnas harem would upset rajputsBy: thoo thoo thoo | Monday , 15 Sep '08 20:05:37 PM Reply | Forward Although he had sixteen thousand and eight wives, Krishna did not let other women go free. Once, when he saw some Gopi women bathing in the river Kalindi, Krishna carried away their clothes from the bank of the river, and got on a nearby tree to feast his eyes on the Gopi women bathing in the nude. He returned their dresses only after each of them came out of the water and worshipped him so that he could see their nude bodies in full. It is claimed that Krishna was so potent that he could satisfy all his 16008 wives at the same time.
Post a Comment
Name:
Email:
Title:
Maximum characters allowed     
Comment:
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.