Win US$10,000 from Prudential www.prudentialasia.com/contest.htm

Express Properties

Search Button

The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

EIW

Market Indicators

Screen

Celebrity Chat

Express Computers

Express Power

Advertisers Forum

Express Careers

Business Forum

Match Maker

Express Properties

Palki - Travel & Tours

Information Technology

Astrosurf

Eco-India

Dr Know

Morning Digest

Graffiti

Crossword

Drumbeat: Ad Buzzaar


Politics

Business

Expressions

General

World

Sports

Leisure

States

 

Wednesday, August 19, 1998

Eradi a bone of contention for Bansi, Badal

EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE  
CHANDIGARH, Aug 18: Taking strong exception to Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal's statement seeking dissolution of the Eradi Tribunal, Haryana chief minister Bansi Lal has demanded early implementation of the Tribunal award. He also sought the construction of the remaining portion of the SYL canal by a Central agency, to help solve the inter-state water disputes.

Charging the Punjab Government of being in the habit of backing out of every agreement which did not favour them, Bansi said there had been several agreements on the inter-state water and territorial issues, but Punjab had always failed to implement them in letter and spirit. Stating that it did not behove of a chief minister like Badal to make such statements, Bansi Lal termed Punjab's demand of dissolving the Eradi Tribunal as ``not only unfair and unjust, but also illegal as it was contrary of the provisions of the Inter State Waters Dispute Act''.

He said that under Section 12 of the Inter State Waters Dispute Act, the CentralGovernment could dissolve the Tribunal only after it had completed its work in all respects and was satisfied that no other reference to the Tribunal in the matter was necessary. He pointed out that the Eradi Tribunal was constituted by the Centre to resolve the river water dispute between Punjab and Haryana, as a result of Rajiv-Longowal Accord signed between the then prime minister Rajiv Gandhi and the then president of Shiromani Akali Dal Sant Harchand Singh Longowal on July 24, 1985. Punjab had also participated in all the proceedings of the Tribunal, till its indicated the share of water of various states on January 30, 1987.

Bansi Lal added that the riparian principle was totally irrelevant in the present context, as Haryana being a successor state of the erstwhile Punjab and also a part of the Indus basin, had equal rights over the waters of Ravi-Beas rivers. Punjab could not claim exclusive rights over these waters, since the river waters were a national asset and their use could not be restrictedto the boundaries of any particular state, he added.

Meanwhile, again charging the Punjab Government of repeatedly changing its stand on the territorial issues, Bansi Lal strongly reiterated the demand for implementation of the recommendations of the Shah Commission in toto, stating that this would be the only way to resolve the matters relating to Chandigarh and other territorial issues. Bansi Lal also expressed his concern over the fact that the control of headworks at Harike, Ropar and Ferozepur had not been transferred to the Bhakra Beas Management Board by the Punjab Government for the last 32 years even though it was obliged to do so under Section 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966.

Copyright © 1998 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.


Top


Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd.

Bank of India

Astrosurf
 

Click here for a printer-friendly page Printer-friendly page

Suresh Chand Jain & Sons: Realtors for New Delhi & Gurgaon


The Indian Express  |  The Financial Express  |  Latest News
Screen  |  Express Investment Week  |  Market Indicators  |  Express Computers
Astrosurf  |  Eco-India  |  Travel & Tourism  |  Information Technology  |  Drumbeat: Ad Buzzaar
Advertisers Forum  |  Career India  |  Business Forum  |  Match Maker  |  Express Properties