Express Properties

Search Button

The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

Market Indicators

Screen

Boulevard India

Celebrity Chat

Express Computers

Express Power

Letters

Advertisers Forum


Headstart

Business Forum

Lifemate

Zevraat

Columnists

Express Properties

Palki - Travel

Information Technology

Astrosurf

Eco-India

Dr Know

Morning Digest

Express Greetings

Graffiti

Cartoon


INDIAN EXPRESS FRONT PAGE

Politics

Business

Expressions

General

World

Sports

Leisure

States

 

Friday, January 8, 1999

Five advocates on token fast

EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE  
SURAT, Jan 7: Five advocates of the Surat District Bar Association (SDBA) embarked on a token fast on Thursday, after week-long protests demanding the arrest of a police official failed to bear fruit. The relay fast will continue till January 11, after which the further course of action will be decided, it was decided at a general meeting of the association on Thursday morning.

The five include senior advocate Vishnu Prasad Trivedi, who was injured when Ahmedabad-based DySP H Y Chudasam drove his private vehicle onto a group of agitating lawyers, Kanu Patel, SDBA secretary Shashikant Rajkotia, Amit Lathiya and Bhagwati Kumar Pandya.

Meanwhile, Chudasama is expected to depose before a magistrate on Friday, exactly a week after he had a scuffle with the advocates, who were picketing outside the court premises, demanding the arrest of BJP councillor Nita Satbhaya's killers.

Chudasama is slated to depose in a murder case (no 116/96) in Mahidharpura area of the city in 1996, when he was a police inspector there. He had come to the city in the same case last Friday when he drove his private vehicle onto the advocates over an argument. The Umra police said he hadn't lodged a cross complaint as yet.

Talking to Express Newsline, Trivedi, who lodged a police complaint against Chudasama, said he was going to file a private complaint in the court against Police Commissioner Kuldip Sharma, the ACP concerned and Umra PI Rajput along with H Y Chudasama under sections 201, 204 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, if Chudasama was not arrested.'' He pointed out that courts had the power to issue warrants against the police officers.

Sections 201, 204 and 34 pertain to ``causing disappearance of evidence'' and ``acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention''. According to Trivedi, his trousers, that bore dust marks where the vehicle drove onto his feet, had been sent to the FSL, but not the vehicle. This, he alleged, was done deliberately to destroy evidence. Trivedi also alleged that though he was entitled to get a copy of the panchnama in the case, he was denied it despite repeated applications to the Umra police for the same.

Though the protests affected the normal functioning of the court, advocates attended to urgent matters like stay orders, bail applications, remand procedures and other important cases.

Association president Ashit Mehta said, ``We have already apologised to the public for the inconvenience caused because of the boycott of work, but we have no other alternative''.

Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.


Top


Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd.

DRDO Recruitment

Astrosurf
 

Click here for a printer-friendly page Printer-friendly page

Search and order from the largest database of Indian books


The Indian Express  |  The Financial Express  |  Latest News
Screen  |  Express Investment Week  |  Market Indicators  |  Express Computers
Astrosurf  |  Eco-India  |  Travel & Tourism  |  Information Technology  |  Drumbeat: Ad Buzzaar
Advertisers Forum  |  Career India  |  Business Forum  |  Match Maker  |  Express Properties