Cut your internet cost now! -- Netwatch

Search
The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

Screen

Express Computer
Feedback
Travel

Matrimonials

Careers

Lifestyle

Astrology

E-Cards

Columnists

Graffiti

Crossword

Letters

Environment

Jewellery
Info-tech

Power

Steel

Advertisers Forum

Business Forum

In association with Amazon.com

Books Music

Enter keywords


INDIAN EXPRESS FRONT PAGE

Politics

Business

Expressions

General

World

Sports

Leisure

States

 

Thursday, April 8, 1999

Kejriwal's nephew was Gill's antagonist

KAVEREE BAMZAI  
NEW DELHI, APRIL 7: The controversy over Prasar Bharati's appointment of Acting Chief Executive Officer O P Kejriwal's nephew as a consultant to ferret out details of irregularity in the sports consortium's dealings with Doordarshan has taken a fresh turn. Journalist Vineet Narain said today the nephew, Arun Aggarwal, was largely responsible for drafting his public interest litigation (Vineet Narain v/s The Union of India and S S Gill) on August 7, 1998, which challenged Gill's appointment as CEO on grounds of ``superannuation and arbitrariness''.

``How can Kejriwal legitimise Aggarwal's unconstitutional position? If the intention was to get to the bottom of any wrongdoing, the CEO could have advertised for an expert instead of choosing someone like Aggarwal who is a medical graduate from Banaras Hindu University and whose only familiarity with finance is his stint at playing the markets,'' said Narain, who is the editor of the Kalchakra video magazine.

The Prasar Bharati board, however, wasunmoved by even this revelation. ``I will ask for his bio-data but we have already endorsed Aggarwal's appointment. We were convinced by his fact-finding expertise,'' said Prasar Bharati board member Rajendra Yadav. He added that he didn't think Aggarwal's PIL against Gill would prejudice his inquiry into the consortium, of which the former CEO is considered the chief architect.

But the Information and Broadcasting Ministry is clearly miffed at not having been told of Aggarwal's appointment and is contemplating suitable action. A senior official reiterated today that the Ministry's concurrence to the appointment ``may not be presumed''.

To add to the drama, Stracon, which took the lead in forming the sports consortium, has refused to revise the agreement for the rights to the cricket World Cup. Nor is it ready to accept Doordarshan's version that it has gained only Rs 10 crore from the deal during 1998-99. Stracon maintains it has paid Rs 109 crore in minimum guarantee revenue but DD says this sumincludes the licence fee and customisation of the live feed.

With only 34 days remaining for the World Cup, the agreement for which was signed in November 1998, time is running out for DD and the Stracon-led consortium to arrive at a resolution of the problem.

Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.


Top


Maruti Udyog Ltd.

 

Click here for a printer-friendly page Printer-friendly page

Search and order from the largest database of Indian books



EXPRESSindia.com
News   Business    Sports   Entertainment
The Indian Express | The Financial Express | Latest News | Screen | Express Computers
Travel | MatrimonialsCareersLifestyle | Astrology
E-Cards | Graffiti | Environment | Jewellery | Info-tech | Power