Return to Story Page
To print: Select File and then Print from your browser's menu

The Jayalalitha baggage

Ritu Sarin

If it was the ghost of Bofors that haunted the Congress regimes, it was the trail of corruption charges faced by J. Jayalalitha for the Atal Behari Vajpayee Government.

Urban Affairs Minister Ram Jethmalani now says that he had submitted his resignation due to the move to, yet again, alter the judicial course of the 46 corruption cases faced by Jayalalitha and some of her former ministers and bureaucrats even as the Supreme Court was seized of the matter.

Jethmalani now says that the Union Cabinet had been kept in the dark about the two notifications (on Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Corruption Act) issued to facilitate Jayalalitha's cases and indignantly, he had offered to resign.

At the same time, the line taken by the Union Government is defended by Attorney General Soli Sorabjee, who is arguing the case in the Supreme Court. ``The Attorney General has to project the Government's viewpoint in the apex court and the arguments given were almost identical to the ones made by the AdditionalSolicitor General in the Chennai High Court,'' he told The Indian Express.

Jayalalitha had challenged the transfer of her cases to a Special Court, first in the High Court and having lost that, in the Supreme Court. She had also made her displeasure with Sorabjee known to the BJP leadership and reportedly included the appointment of a new Attorney General in her charter of demands shortly before withdrawing support.

Jayalalitha's trouble with the law enforcement agencies began soon after she relinquished charge as Tamil Nadu Chief Minister in May 1996. Soon, the state's Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) launched a six-day search operation at her Poes Garden residence and business establishments, which led the agency to a virtual treasure trove. Courts were told that the raids resulted in seizure of some 28 kg of jewellery (worth Rs 51 crore), 91 wrist-watches, 41 air-conditioners, 10,500 sarees, 750 pairs of footwear and so on...The raids also led DVAC to sheaves of documentspertaining Jayalalitha's properties and business transactions in which she had allegedly intervened as Chief Minister.

The investigations led the DVAC to some startling revelations. For instance, while before she was Chief Minister, Jayalalitha's assets were worth Rs 2.01 crore, after five years in power, her assets were calculated to be disproportionate by Rs 66.65 crore. The probe into the assets began in June 1996, on the basis of a complaint filed by Subramanian Swamy. After 1,053 witnesses and 15,000 pages of evidence were examined, a formal case under the Prevention of Corruption Act was registered.

The case of the prosecution is that while Jayalalitha along with her confidant, N. Sasikala and V.N. Sudhagaran, Sasikala's nephew, went on an acquisition binge between 1991 and 1996. They, the prosecution said, floated 32 business partnerships together, but there was very little activity that took place in these companies. And no Income Tax or Commercial tax was paid. In all, Jayalalitha and Sasikalaowned 11 properties (worth Rs 15.93 crore) and Jayalalitha's associates (held by them on her behalf) owned 109 properties (worth Rs 30.45 crore).

Among the business scams, courts have framed charges in three, including the case of disproportionate assets and colour TV case and chargesheets have been filed in the TANSI case and the coal scam. Briefly, the charges faced by the AIADMK supremo are as follows: