CricEx

Search
The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

Screen

Express Computer
Feedback
Corporate Results

Expresswheels

Travel

Matrimonials

Careers

Lifestyle

Astrology

E-Cards

Columnists

Graffiti

Crossword

Letters

Environment

Jewellery
Info-tech

Power

Steel

Global Tenders

Filmtvindia

In association with Amazon.com

Books Music

Enter keywords


INDIAN EXPRESS FRONT PAGE

Politics

Business

Expressions

General

World

Sports

Leisure

States

 

Wednesday, June 2, 1999

Aussies erred in making tactics public

Richard Hadlee  
If ever a team had the motivation in this competition, the New Zealand `Black Caps' had a point to prove to themselves and to Australia in their final match in the preliminary round against Scotland. Last week, there was very little interest in the match between New Zealand and Scotland, with an expected New Zealand victory being all but a formality, which would be enough to get them in to the Super Six. However, in the last couple of days all attention had been focussed on this match as it held one of the final keys as to which teams would go through to the next stage of the World Cup.

Australia had to defeat the West Indies in their final match to ensure they had a place in Group B at the expense of New Zealand or the West Indies. They did, in fact, defeat the West Indies at Edgbaston, but deliberately slowed down their run rate when they knew they had secured the win, in an attempt to lift the West Indian run rate above that which they felt New Zealand could achieve, even if the Kiwis defeatScotland.

This approach would have frustrated and annoyed the Kiwis because the spirit of fair play was breached -- surely when a team plays cricket you want to win and win well. It brings to mind the infamous `under-arm incident' which took place on February 1 1981, at the MCG, when the Australian captain, Greg Chappell instructed his younger brother Trevor, to bowl the last ball of the match under-arm, to deny New Zealand a chance of hitting a six to tie the match.

Whilst the rules were there to be used to the teams' advantage, the Australians took the rules to the brink. The fact that the Australians publicly stated what they had done in their World Cup encounter against the West Indies, has not endeared themselves to the public life in the United Kingdom, where Australian sportsmen have few friends. If they had intended to use those tactics, it would have been better not to have declared so, publicly.

Tactics became very important, but maybe the future World Cup rules will need to be addressed toprevent this from happening again.

For New Zealand to qualify, they knew exactly what they had to do. New Zealand needed to be very positive in their approach and go all out to win the match. They made some necessary team changes Matthew Horne who has been short of runs was replaced by left-arm spinner Matthew Hart, to open the batting and Carl Bulfin replaced the dependable Gavin Larsen to add fire-power to the bowling and to get wickets. Neither team tactic worked as Hart scored a duck and Bulfin was the most expensive of the bowlers. The selectors will need to reconsider their next options.

The other New Zealand bowlers did a magnificent job in dismissing Scotland for 121 in 42.1 overs, with Man of the Match Geoff Allott, bowling superbly again and captured 3-15 to become the leading wicket-taker in the tournament with 15 wickets.

Dion Nash and Chris Harris, with their nagging line and length, were also impressive and the fielding was very alert and full of purpose.

Set 122 to win in under 22overs was the target and whilst New Zealand lost two early wickets, the experience of Roger Twose (54 not out in 49 balls) and Chris Cairns saw them home with three overs to spare. Twose played some bold shots and rode his luck well as fortune favoured the brave. It was a sweet moment for the Kiwis because the mission was accomplished in some style when the odds were stacked against them, especially with the added pressure of run rates constantly in the back of their minds.

The winning or losing margin for New Zealand to qualify for the next stage was so close. It all came down to a technicality, a better net run rate than the West Indies. Whilst the West Indies will be `gutted' by the Kiwis' success, it was the same for England, who also disappear from the competition, as India also did what they had to do, and that was to win their final in a pressure situation.

New Zealand will now be looking forward to continue their battles against South Africa, Zimbabwe and Indian and those two valuable pointscarried through to the next stage gives New Zealand a chance of reaching the semi-finals.

Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.


Top


Phone Cards: 44c a minute to India

Great Britain : Towards the next millenium

 

Click here for a printer-friendly page Printer-friendly page

India Gift House: Send gifts all over India



EXPRESSindia.com
News   Business    Sports   Entertainment
The Indian Express | The Financial Express | Latest News | Screen | Express Computers
Travel | MatrimonialsCareersLifestyle | Astrology
E-Cards | Graffiti | Environment | Jewellery | Info-tech | Power