CricEx

Search
The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

Screen

Express Computer
Feedback
Corporate Results

Expresswheels

Travel

Matrimonials

Careers

Lifestyle

Astrology

E-Cards

Columnists

Graffiti

Crossword

Letters

Environment

Jewellery
Info-tech

Power

Steel

Global Tenders

Filmtvindia

In association with Amazon.com

Books Music

Enter keywords


INDIAN EXPRESS FRONT PAGE

Politics

Business

Expressions

General

World

Sports

Leisure

States

 

Friday, June 4, 1999

Tansi case deferred again

PRESS TRUST OF INDIA  
CHENNAI, JUNE 3: A special judge on Thursday adjourned proceedings in the Tamil Nadu Small Industries Corporation (TANSI) case to June 8, accepting a defence counsel's plea for the adjournment on the ground that the judge's order directing Mohammad Asif, an accused in the case, to be examined by a panel of government doctors, had been challenged in the Madras High Court.

Asif's condition had led to three postponements in framing of charges against the accused in the case, in which AIADMK leader Jayalalitha is the main accused. Framing of charges was first fixed for May 25, then May 28 and May 31.

On May 31, Judge P Anbazhagan had written to the dean of the government general hospital requesting him to constitute a panel of doctors, including one from the railway hospital here, to examine Asif, a former AIADMK minister, who was stated to be suffering from a heart ailment.

Others arraigned in the case are Jayalalitha's close friend Sasikala Natarajan, former managing director of the state-owned TANSI, TSrinivasan, a Deputy Collector of Stamps S Nagarajan and a former secretary in Jayalalitha's office when she was chief minister, Karpoorasundara Pandian.

The case relates to purchase of land and buildings of TANSI, by `Jaya Publications' a firm in which the AIADMK leader and Sasikala were partners, far below the then prevailing rate and evasion of stamp duty and registration charges.

As soon as the special court commenced its sitting for the day, defence counsel Jothi pleaded with the judge to adjourn proceedings in the case till June 8 as Justice E Padmanabhan of the Madras High Court had posted the writ petition filed by him to June 7.

Paying no heed to public prosecutor G Krishmurthy's objection to the request for adjournment, Jothi contended that Justice Padmanabhan had remarked: ``The trial judge is an experienced senior judge and he knows what to do and the writ petition will not become infructuous.''

Jothi said that in reply to his submission that if the trial court acted on the panel's medicalreport before June 7 his petition would become infructuous, the judge had held that the report could also be in his (Asif's) favour.

Special Judge Anbazhagan after hearing defence counsel's submissions asked him to put it down in writing. However, at the insistence of the public prosecutor, the defence counsel was directed to give his submissions in an affidavit.

Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.


Top


Phone Cards: 44c a minute to India

Great Britain : Towards the next millenium

 

Click here for a printer-friendly page Printer-friendly page

India Gift House: Send gifts all over India



EXPRESSindia.com
News   Business    Sports   Entertainment
The Indian Express | The Financial Express | Latest News | Screen | Express Computers
Travel | MatrimonialsCareersLifestyle | Astrology
E-Cards | Graffiti | Environment | Jewellery | Info-tech | Power