He said supporters of the Senate's India-Pakistan sanctions reform legislation had argued that this linkage just did not make sense for two reasons. First, it was unrealistic to expect a democratic nations such as India to yield to such pressure and second it was hard to justify opposing development finance to a country like India with more than 500 million persons living on less than one dollar per day, he added.

He said the Senate had give a strongimpetus to US Diplomacy in South Asia and done so in way that reflected the broadest possible political support. O'Hare was optimistic that the leaders of the US House of Representatives would concur with the Senate approach. The Senate had made a policy statement, introducing the principle that export control should be applied only to entities that ``make direct and material contributions to weapons of mass destruction and missile programmes and only to those items that could contribute such to such programmes''.

The Council, a leading US business organisation dealing with commercial relations of the two countries, said the Senate measure established the foundation for broad-based, bipartisan consensus on the US approach to a region where the United States had large and rapidly increasing commercial and national security interests.The amendment, introduced by Senators Sam Brownback and Pat Roberts (both Republicans) with support from across the political spectrum, had several significant aspects and shouldbe considered in all of its particulars, he added. O'Hare hoped that the administration would restore the funding for India's economic reforms which it had withheld in the wake of the nuclear tests.