Odigo: A new search and communication tool

Have a flair with words?

Search
Elections '99

The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

Screen

Express Computer
Feedback
Mythology

CerfKids

Corporate Results

Ebate

Matrimonials

Careers

Lifestyle

Astrology

E-Cards

Columnists

Graffiti

Crossword

Letters

Jewellery
Info-tech

Power

Steel


INDIAN EXPRESS FRONT PAGE

Politics

Business

Expressions

General

World

Sports

Leisure

States

 

Tuesday, September 21, 1999

SC wants prompt action by States on inquiry reports

UNITED NEWS OF INDIA  
NEW DELHI, SEPT 20: The Supreme Court has expressed its anguish over the manner in which the reports of the commission of inquiry are being taken by various states in the country.

The court's anguish was expressed by a three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice A S Anand, Justice S Rajendra Babu and Justice R C Lahiti, while directing consigning to records of the court, a PIL seeking a direction to the Uttar Pradesh Government to take follow-up action on the report of Justice C D Parakh Commission, which went into the Meerut riots of September 20, 1982

The court direction came following an affidavit from State Home Secretary N Ravi Shankar stating that the State Cabinet with a view to "maintaining religious and political harmony in Meerut city and to avoiding any flare-up in any particular class or community", had decided not to take any further action on the basis of the Parakh Commission report which itself did not identify any particular person responsible for the riots nor fixed responsibility fordereliction of duty on any official.

"The State Government having considered the reports and taken a decision, this petition does not require any further consideration and is consigned to records," the Court said.

The court noted that in this case, it had taken more than a decade for the State Government to take notice of the report of the Commission headed by a former judge of Allahabad High Court.

"On account of such inaction for a long period of time, the very purpose of constitution of a Commission of inquiry under the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 gets frustrated and the argument that such commission are appointed under the act only as an eyewash acquires credibility," the court observed.

Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.


Top



New! 39c a minute to India

123india.com: Join the chat
 

Click here for a printer-friendly page Printer-friendly page



EXPRESSindia.com
Elections '99
News   Business   Sports   Entertainment
The Indian Express | The Financial Express | Latest News | Screen | Express Computers
Matrimonials | Careers | Lifestyle | Mythology | Astrology
E-Cards | Graffiti | Columnists | Ebate | Jewellery | Cerfkids
Corporate Results | Info-tech | Power