
Elections '99

The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

Screen

Express Computer

Livestylz

Mythology

CerfKids

Corporate Results

Ebate

Matrimonials

Careers

Astrology


E-Cards

Columnists

Graffiti

Crossword

Letters

Jewellery

Info-tech

Power

Steel

|

| |
Wednesday, October 13, 1999
Periscope On Pakistan
The Indian Express brings you snippets from the Pak mediaSC disposes of Benazir's review petition THE NATION: The Supreme Court on Monday disposed of the review petition of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto regarding the dissolution of the National Assembly in 1996. The court observed that the findings of the Supreme Court in the dissolution case were not conclusive findings of guilt and could not be used against the petitioner at any judicial forum. Benazir Bhutto, the chairperson of PPP, had moved a review petition in the Supreme Court against the judgement of the apex court upholding the dissolution of the National Assembly in 1996 and consequent dismissal of her government. Aitzaz Ahsan, counsel for the petitioner, had asked the court to delete the portions of the judgment which could be used to malign her client. The review petition was heard by a seven-member bench of the Supreme Court.CTBT: India requires persuasion THE NATION: President Clinton's SpecialAssistant on South Asia and Near East, Bruce Riedel, is visiting Pakistan and India soon. The trip lasting 10 days is well-timed from Washington's point of view. An agreed version of the Brownback-II amendment having already been thrashed out, the possibility of its becoming a law is a certainty, before Mr Riedel leaves the US. Pakistan, which has linked the signing of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) with the creation of a ``coercion-free'' environment -- that has been spelled out only to mean the removal of Glenn, Symington and Pressler amendments -- would have no excuse left for not acceding to the treaty. It must be pointed out that it would be wrong to assume that the passage of Brownback-II would open the gates of military and economic co-operation between Islamabad and Washington; it would only pass the responsibility on to the American President to decide whether the application of restrictions on such a co-operation would not be in the national security interests of the US. Thus almost everyrequest from Pakistan for the purchase of sophisticated military equipment would need processing at the Presidential level. In other words, Brownback-II does not stipulate the end of coercion, but only takes away its application from the legislators and authorises the White House to use it whenever it deemed fit.On the other side of the border, at New Delhi, Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee would have been installed as Prime Minister before Mr Riedel arrives, and the time would be ripe to remind him of his commitment that the Indian position on the CTBT would be decided by the new government that took office after the general elections. Taking full advantage of the favourable mood in Washington, the Indians have played their cards exceedingly well. Not only have they held back their verdict on the treaty, but, perhaps, to test the strength of its support, have released a dreadful nuclear doctrine carrying portents for powers much beyond the region. The doctrine though severely criticised at the time ofannouncement, has ceased to find mention in the briefings of the State Department spokesmen...It would be India that would need persuading by Mr Riedel. Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.

Top
|
|
|


Printer-friendly page |
|