
The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

Screen

Express Computer

Livestylz

Mythology

CerfKids

Corporate Results

Ebate

Matrimonials

Careers

Astrology


E-Cards

Columnists

Graffiti

Crossword

Letters

Jewellery

Info-tech

Power

Steel

|

| |
Tuesday, November 2, 1999
Mister Mister
The celebrity and media presence at the Mr International contest in the Capital has added an altogether different dimension to the phrase gender equality. Yes, as the man from Venezuela that traditional provider of beauty queens and now, well, kings with its eclectic genetic mix -- flew off with the crown by earnestly affirming that, indeed, it is a man's world, it seemed only fair. If gorgeous women, sashaying smilingly and mouthing politically correct gems, can become role models feted by heads of state, why can't men enjoy the same career options? If Donald Trump can revamp the Miss Universe extravaganza and if Eric and Julia Morley's Miss World show can enjoy a second coming in their homeland, why can't beefy hunks be accorded the same measure of wide-eyed incredulity and, more importantly, the same indulgence from corporate sponsors? If little girls in countless Indian neighbourhoods can graduate from playing with their Barbies to impersonating the Sushmitas and the Aishwaryas in local contests, whycan't their male counterparts too take a break from tennis-ball cricket and flex their muscles?But seriously. Perhaps viewing male shows as a levelling of the playing field in the booming beauty industry would be a trifle simplistic. As a new socio-cultural grouping takes shape -- an urban herd spread across upmarket islands in increasingly wired metropolises across the globe, a herd which is subjected to common and instantly messaged fashion whims -- a thesis offered by a controversial new book merits recounting. In Stiffed, Susan Faludi details the current shift towards an "ornamental culture," resulting in "a society drained of context, saturated with a competitive individualism that has been robbed of craft or utility, and ruled by commercial values that revolve around who has the most, the best, the biggest, the fastest." This ornamental culture, with its consumerist excess and attendant entertainment industry, propels men towards "the conformism, passivity and consumerist mirror-gazing traditionallyheld to be feminine". Faludi argues that the additional male self-doubt resulting from the passage of the comforting affirmations of masculinity conferred by being the sole breadwinner, has led to a redefinition of manhood as something to be displayed in toned designer muscles, in transiently fashionable accessories. Male vanity, it would thus seem, is symptomatic of a crisis of masculinity, a crisis of self-esteem. It's a place women have inhabited for so long that it's become a way of life for them, what upheavals will male adjustment entail? Feminists have tended to view the beauty myth as a sinister conspiracy by greedy companies to rake in profits as unsuspecting consumers go for yet another product to replicate in themselves an ever unattainable ideal. There may be a more asexual underpinning to the ornamental culture, but the enticing images of individuality are just as chimerical in the turn-of-the-century age of conformity, in the unrelenting struggle to keep up with the urban herd. Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.

Top
|
|
|


Printer-friendly page |
|