Search
The Indian Express

The Financial Express

Latest News

Livestylz

Mythology

CerfKids

Corporate Results

Matrimonials

Careers

Astrology

Feedback
Columnists

Crossword

Letters

Jewellery
Daily IT Update

Express Computer

Screen

Power

Steel


INDIAN EXPRESS FRONT PAGE

Politics

Business

Expressions

General

World

Sports

Leisure

States

 

Tuesday, November 30, 1999

Encroachment vs beautification -- Debate continues

AMIT ROY  
PANCHKULA, NOV 29: Even though the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) started its anti-encroachment drive last month, its debate with the residents over what it terms encroachments and latter beautification has been continuing for the past so many months. Recently, HUDA issued notices to the residents in Sectors 7, 8 and 9 and announced its decision to charge residents for removing the encroachments and then for clearing the area of the malba.

Residents express resentment at this decision, as they claim they are beautifying the area, which, if not maintained, can lead to the growth of congress grass. HUDA Administrator Abhilaksh Likhi claimed that they have been issuing notices to the residents and a majority of them have already removed the encroachments.

HUDA also announced its charges for dismantling encroachments. While for a plot sized 420 sq.m and above, Rs 800 would be charged as dismantling charges, Rs 500 would be charged for a plot sized 300-419 sq.m, Rs 300 for a 138-299 sq.m plot, and for a plot below 138 sq.m Rs 200 would be charged.

As far as institutions, schools, industrial groups, housing etc. are concerned, the charges would be Rs 30 per running metre of the hedge, fence etc. The charges for malba lifting in these categories will be Rs 1,500, Rs 1,000, Rs 700, Rs 500 and Rs 60 per running metre, respectively. However, Sanjay Gupta, one of the residents, asks HUDA to mark an area where all the malba can be dumped. "If the authorities expect us to remove the malba, then at least they should earmark some area for the purpose."

Sushma Gupta, a housewife, emphasises: "We are not encroaching, but beautifying the area. Moreover, by removing the fences, HUDA is exposing the plants to stray cattle, a menace which HUDA has not been able to tackle."

Meanwhile, as far as markets are concerned they are ruled by the shopkeepers. In most of the markets, shopkeepers have displayed their goods in the corridors, hence leaving very little walking space. HUDA had earlier cleared the area, but as always it led to a protest by the shopkeepers, who closed their shops causing inconvenience to the residents.

A resident, Vikas Kashyap questions: "Why can't HUDA frame and implement a policy to maintain a check on the visible encroachments by shopkeepers ?"Another problem bothering the shoppers are the rehriwallahs parked nicely in the area marked for vehicles. As a result, most of the visitors have to park their vehicles on the main road, causing traffic chaos most of the time. In many sectors, jhuggi dwellers have also occupied a lot of HUDA land and though the department removes them as a routine, but the dwellers (as a routine) come back as soon as the authorities turn their backs.

Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.


Top


WorldQuest Network Phonecards! Only 30c/m phone calls to INDIA


 

Click here for a printer-friendly page Printer-friendly page

Saif Zone: International Free Zone -- Sharjah Airport



EXPRESSindia.com
News   Business   Sports   Entertainment
The Indian Express | The Financial Express | Latest News | Screen | IT Update | Express Computers
Matrimonials | Careers | Livestylz | Mythology | Astrology
Columnists | Ebate | Jewellery | Cerfkids
Corporate Results | Steel | Power