February
26, 2001
Unknown crusader
Few
people know about the Kanpur-based Virendra Jain who runs the Midas
Touch Investor Association. Those who do, see him as a quixotic crusader
waging a lonely war against the Canstar Mutual Fund scheme as well as
vanishing companies. For many long years his battle seemed
fruitless, barring minor successes like the setting up of court directed
task forces to investigate vanishing companies. Just as the regulators
were beginning to take him for granted, things changed. Justice Bhanwar
Singh of the Allahabad High Court decided to summon SEBI chairman D
R Mehta to Court and directed him to show cause why specific court directions
regarding the Canstar scheme had not been carried out. Ironically, it
was Mehtas direct intervention which forced Canstar to pay much
more money to investors than it has originally proposed. However, the
payment of Rs 23 per unit was still lower than the promised return of
Rs 26.50 assured under the scheme. The summons is probably a lesson
that Court orders are never to be trifled with.
Deadly
deathtrap
Every time the Indian highways claim a celebrity life, it sparks of
much hand wringing and a short-lived debate on safety standards. Congress
leader Rajesh Pilots death and that of several school children
recently focussed some attention on road accidents. In Maharshtra, the
demise of theatre star Bhakti Barve drew attention to the problems of
reckless driving on the high-speed, international class Mumbai-Pune
Expressway. But road accident statistics are chilling enough even without
these high profile victims. Deaths on Indian roads are at least
six times worse than the worst of the European countries, says
G Raghuram in the India Infrastructure report 2001, and this estimate
does not include the large number of unreported deaths. Britan which
has the safest roads in Europe and a vehicular density of 67/km of road,
has only 1.5 road deaths for every 10,000 vehicles. India, with a mere
10 vehicles/km has a hefty 20.8 deaths for every 10,000 vehicles. The
number of deaths increase to 51 when calculated per billion passenger
kilometres. The high level of deaths are attributed to drunken drivers,
overloaded transport vehicles (both goods and passenger vehicles), poor
maintenance of roads as well automobiles and gross indiscipline by drivers.
The bigger tragedy is that this issue hasnt even become important
enough to develop into a campaign for road discipline and safety measures.
ANMIs squabbles
Right until the Supreme Court verdict, stock brokers across the country,
had stayed strongly united for eight long years, irrespective of their
stock exchanges. No sooner did the apex court ruled against them, than
their unity crumbled and squabbles broke out. At the Association of
NSE Members of India (ANMI), the verdict led to nasty allegations regarding
collection of legal fees, appointment of advocates and about the misutilisation
of funds meant for legal expenses. The response of ANMI chairman (western
region) Dhrupad Mahadevia is most poetic. Dismissing the charges as
arrows aimed by pencil pushers envious of the unity and focus
of the region, he defends all ANMI actions saying: The search
for someone to blame is always successful. Even as the ice continues
to melt in the Himalayas (pg.15, line 10 of the SC judgement), let us
together stem the flow, else we shall be doomed to drift in the Indian
Ocean.
Quoting Lord Shaftesbury, he writes: We are not here to play,
to dream to drift; We have hard work to do and loads to lift; Shun no
the struggle fact it, is Gods Gift. Unfortunately,
this poetic plea has yet to bring ANMI members together.
Hotshot consultants?
When hot shot international consultants Ernst & Young
were caught plagiarising the environmental impact report on a dam project
for its client Murdeshwar Power Corporation, it tried to live down the
embarrassment by sacking the person responsible. This person had simply
copied the impact report prepared by the Institute for Catchment Studies
and Environmental Management, Bangalore, for the Tattihalla Augmentation
Scheme and passed it off as an assessment by Ernst & Young. The
Karnataka greens used this fraud to campaign successfully
against the project and the entire controversy was reported by this
paper (B S Nagraj, August 27, 2000). If Ernst & Young thought that
the problem was now behind it, it is in for a nasty shock.
The
Indian Express report has been reproduced in its entirety by the India
Infrastructure Report 2001 (brought out by the Infrastructure Development
Finance Corporation) which is set to be a definite annual document on
the status of Indian infrastructure projects. Clearly, a huge price
to pay for a slothful employee and careless supervision. The fact that
IDFC serves as the Secretariat to the Prime Ministers Task Force
on Infrastructure can only add to the consultants woes.
Updated
weekly.
The
author's e-mail address is: suchetadalal@yahoo.com
Other
columnists: