March
19, 2001
Shooting
the messenger
One of the strangest victims of the BSE crisis is A A Tirodkar, finance
director & secretary. Tirodkar, who is one of the senior most executives
of the stock exchange, is accused of leaking crucial tapes containing
Anand Rathis conversation with the BSE surveillance officials
to the media. Tirodkar, say sources close to him, took charge of the
tapes only after the BSE office bearers had claimed to SEBI that there
was no such conversation between the president and the surveillance
team. His intention was to protect the tapes and ensure that they did
not vanish. However, in trying to do his bit for the exchange, Tirodkar
seems to have placed his trust in a former BSE president, who promptly
leaked the information to a journalist.
Amusingly,
the letter written by executive director A N Joshi to Tirodkar says
that the leakage of sensitive information from the surveillance
department has caused serious damage to the image of the stock
exchange and also eroded the integrity of the entire capital market.
Joshi seems so influenced by the brokers way of thinking that
he is confused about who has really eroded the BSEs reputation
and integrity. To him, Anand Rathis crime in accessing
surveillance data is far less serious than Tirodkars alleged crime
of reporting/leaking it.
The regulator
thinks otherwise.
Whose
influence?
One faction of the BSE believes that Tirodkars suspension was
not even A N Joshis decision. Ever since he was appointed the
executive director, he has remained silently in the background and carried
out the presidents wishes. This time too, in writing the March
13 letter, Joshi was obeying the BSE president not Anand Rathi,
but President-for-a-day-and-half Deena Mehta. We learn that Joshi feels
beholden to Ms Mehta and could not turn down her demand to suspend Tirodkar,
and to appoint a high power management committee to go into
the alleged omissions and commissions that occurred under
him. But what about SEBI and the Finance Ministry? Having correctly
initiated harsh action against the BSE broker directors, they would
look a little foolish if they permitted BSE to shoot the messenger.
After all, it takes a lot of courage for employees to squeal against
management, and punishing Tirodkar, who is loyal and close-mouthed sends
the wrong signals down the line.
Who
is favourite?
In a recent television interview, former BSE president M G Damani alleged
that SEBI has always been anti-BSE and has worked against the exchange.
Given Damanis grave demeanour, those who do not know the facts,
are bound to melt with sympathy for the BSEs plight. Take a look
at these facts: Some of the BSEs high profile visitors in the
last year included US President Bill Clinton, the Prime Minister
of India, the Finance Minister (thrice), Pramod Mahajan (at least thrice),
the Maharashtra Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh (at least four times)
and sundry other biggies. Naturally, the entire SEBI top brass was always
in attendance. On the other hand, the SEBI chairman visited the NSE
Indias largest stock exchange for the first time
a couple of months ago; the politicians have yet to discover it. Draw
your own conclusions about which is the more favoured exchange.
Ratnakar
& Gelli
Now that the live-wire Ramesh Gelli has run into some serious trouble,
it has led to inevitable comparisons with the brilliant but flawed career
of the late B Ratnakar former chairman of Canara Bank. Both made
a modest beginning and clawed their way up by their wits and intelligence.
Ratnakar was not only very bright himself, but had the ability to spot
talent and nurture it with the right incentives. In the eighties, he
gave the mammoth State Bank of India a terrific run for its money in
businesses such as investment banking and fund management, the downside
was that a lot of dubious issues hit the market. Gelli had an equally
bright career rising from the middle rungs of Vysya Bank to head a bank
as an entrepreneur. Both bankers were flawed by their desperate hurry
to make it big. Fairgrowth collapsed in the wake of the securities scam,
Ratnakar was later accused of foisting cowboy bankers on to the system.
Gellis future remains to be seen.
From
flyovers to Tara?
Remember how we told you that Ratikant Basus ambitious multi-lingual
Tara channel was up for sale? After being rejected by Sony, Tara approached
Star TV for a buyout Stars parent company NewsCorp has
a small stake in Tara. Star too turned down the proposal and Tara has
now approached the Construction Company V M Jog for a buyout. The approach
has been made through a Marathi producer and a friendly investment banker.
It will be interesting to see of Jog zooms from Expressways and controversial
flyovers out to a Tara.
Updated
weekly.
The
author's e-mail address is: suchetadalal@yahoo.com
Other
columnists: