




Of course, over the longer period, redressing endemic causes or deficient agriculture and inability of supply to meet the rising demand curve needs to be addressed.
Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, while addressing the recent Spring Meeting of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, referred to the land diversion for bio-fuel contributing to food scarcity as being unconscionable. This sentiment may be echoed in many capitals, but is only a part of the problem. Estimates vary on how much food for humans has been lost in this process, as compared to the more fundamental causes: the unprecedented third year drought in Australia, and global warming leading to a decline in over-all agricultural productivity. Rising incomes in demographically dense but poorer countries has contributed substantially to both rising demand of cereals as well as changing consumption habits, generating pressure in the higher value-added food chain. Increasing consumption of animal proteins necessitates production of adequate animal feed of acceptable quality and the efficiency of conversion within the food chain vary greatly. They need independent assessment.
The Exogenous Shocks Facility, designed to help countries in fragile situations, does mention commodity price rise. In the press briefing at the conclusion of the Fund Bank meeting, there is mention that “reports kept resurfacing about high fuel and food price, with Oil still being about $100 a barrel and food prices having jumped 48 per cent since 2006. The commodity-producing countries that export may have enjoyed windfall gains but the poorer countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America and Caribbean’s have felt the pinch of higher commodity prices. The World Bank president, in seeking to act quickly to help hungry people, has committed an emergency aid to the UN World Food Programme of $500 million and has also sought the backing for a New Deal on Global Food Prices to combat hunger and malnutrition. It was recognised that over 100 million people could be pushed back deeper into poverty if action was not taken and the more affluent nations were exhorted that “we can’t afford to wait and that we have to put our money where our mouth is — now — so that we can put food into hungry mouths. It is as stark as that”.
... contd.


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications