skip to content
Advertisement
Premium
This is an archive article published on March 28, 2010

‘Modi has said nobody is above law and he has kept his word’

After Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi’s questioning for over five hours by the SIT on Saturday,the BJP said Modi,by his action,had proved that he believed in supremacy of law of the land....

After Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi’s questioning for over five hours by the SIT on Saturday,the BJP said Modi,by his action,had proved that he believed in supremacy of law of the land,even as the main opposition party made a strong case for “autonomous functioning of institutions in the country”.

Modi has twice been mentioned as prime ministerial material by BJP president Nitin Gadkari,and at the recent party conclave,Modi’s name (along with a couple of other leaders) were described by the BJP president as party’s “future prospects”.

After Modi’s appearance before the SIT,two divergent currents were seen in the central BJP on Saturday.

Story continues below this ad

BJP spokesperson Rajiv Pratap Rudy spoke more in terms of Modi’s personality. Rudy said Modi (through his appearance before SIT) “had demolished mischievous speculation about him” and that his “graceful action vindicated BJP’s position” and that it appeared that “SIT team is tired,Modi is not”.

Another spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman,who was officially fielded by the party to address the media after Modi’s deposition,talked in terms of “supremacy of institutions”. “Modi has said that nobody is above the law and he has kept his word,” Sitharaman said. “The SIT was formed by the Supreme Court. We should allow the courts to function and learn to respect institutions,” she said,adding that Modi was assisting SIT in the probe and that he had not been summoned by it. She also reminded the Congress about its track record on “respecting institutions” in the country.

She also slammed Union Law Minister M Veerappa Moily for reportedly suggesting that Modi should co-operate with SIT,implying that one institution must not interfere in the functioning of another institution. She also reminded the Congress that “there were hardly any convictions in the 1984 riots” whereas “several people have already been convicted in the 2002 riots in Gujarat”. The main opposition also accused the media of being driven by activists pursuing the 2002 riots case.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement