Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

1989

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Had it not been for Nicolae Ceausescu, Herta Mueller, who has just won the Nobel for literature 20 years after the fall of communism in Europe, would perhaps never have become a writer. Her theme — a life behind the Iron Curtain, hounded by the state security apparatus, worrying every morning whether one would be alive that evening, fear of the gulag — approximates life in communist East Europe. It was in 1989 that an unprecedented, unpredicted wind of change swept through the former East Bloc, tearing down the authoritarian edifice in state after state. It was the same year that China forcefully put down the Tiananmen Square protests, but that self-assertion of the regime would find no reflection in Europe, except for a brief spectre of firing in East Germany, ensuring that communism died in East Europe without bloodshed,

    except for Ceausescu in Romania.

    Ads by Google

    Mikhail Gorbachev helped. But what 1989 did to global geopolitics and history was not determined by an individual. A brief calendar — June 4: Solidarity won Polish elections; September 10: East Germans crossed Hungary’s borders into Austria in droves; November 9: the Berlin Wall fell; November 24: Velvet Revolution succeeded in Czechoslovakia; December 25: Ceausescu executed. The “Autumn of Nations” lasted only a few months; in its aftermath, two Germanys reunited, the Soviet Union collapsed and the Cold War ended.

    It began with Solidarity’s roundtable talks in Poland, became irreversible with Hungary lifting the Iron Curtain and the citywide Leipzig protests exactly 20 years ago this Friday. But the fall of the Berlin Wall remains its most enduring symbol. Such societies that came in from the cold are far from perfecting their politics, but work such as Mueller’s is an enduring testament to the courage of the millions who faced down totalitarian regimes in the biggest revolutions since 1917.

    voting mandatoryBy: Prem Shetty......Pune | 13-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Despite Governments sincere efforts to keep shut all the establishments on voting day.....voters have not turn out in huge numbers....now we think government should release more funds on the specific areas where the voting rate is high and concentrate more development works on that particular areas as this will encourage others to canvass their votes......secondly there should be a affidavit explanation who dont cast their votes and all their goverment facilities should be kept on hold.....Its unfortunate that well educated people only dicsuss this things in their drawing rooms while having a cup of Tea,and dont come out to Vote....And in slums almost 80-90 % voters canvass their votes.....This is our Indian Democracy....
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.