Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

2.0 GOOD

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The CR-V has been Honda’s ace in India ever since it was launched in 2003. The Japanese auto giant’s ethos of blending technology with market dynamics is amply exhibited in its SUV, which is quite unlike any other. In fact, it’s so unconventinal and car-like in its looks and abilities that it spawned a new segment: soft-roaders. The lack of diesel products has always hindered Honda’s initiatives in the country, but with the new, smaller 2.0 litre variant it tries to answer some of the issues.

    Interiors/ Exterior
    The new CR-V is pretty much the same as the older version from inside as well as outside. Its stately poise and sophisticated, trimmed lines have made it one of the best-selling SUVs in the country and even after several years, it remains a genuine head-turner. It’s a compact five-seater, as opposed to the Endeavour with its additional row, which makes it a practical, urban beast. The cabin and instrument panel give the same cockpit-like feel which has been so much in vogue because of the Civic. The gear levers have been integrated with the instrument panel, which enhances the car’s sportiness. It is indeed difficult to find fault with a vehicle that is so delicately carved. The inner space is adequate and the fifth passenger does not need to squeeze in. The boot is equally spacious.

    Ads by Google

    Engine and Powertrain
    We have always been a fan of CR-V’s refined drive and excellent 2.4-litre engine. The smaller 2.0 litre engine is impressive but not as exciting. The 2.0 litre i-Vtec engine belts out a decent 143 bhp @6,000 rpm as against the 2.4 litre’s 161 bhp. But what makes this vehicle a tad boring is the low torque of 190 Nm as opposed to the 218 Nm in the existing mode. The car feels especially sluggish with the air conditioning on. The handling and grip on the road remain top notch, and special mention must be made of its abysmally low NVH and almost non-existent body roll. The CR-V had limited off-roading capabilities due to its low ground clearance, and this version does not even have the real-time 4*4 of its predecessor, which further restricts its capabilities. At best, this is a vehcile for weekend getaways to the hills, not to the jungles. If you are looking for excitement, the 2.4-litre engine is decidedly better.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.