Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

200 dead in Israeli attack on Gaza

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Gaza
    Israeli military confirmed they had conducted strikes, saying they targeted ‘terrorist infrastructure’.

    Though Israel had been threatening to end its policy of restraint that saw only limited strikes against rocket launchers and squads in recent days, the timing of the raid came as a surprise to Gazans. It came in mid-morning, when official buildings and security compounds were filled with personnel and children were at school, and not, as many had anticipated, at night.

    Expecting some kind of Israeli response, the Hamas leaders in Gaza had already been in hiding for two days.

    In a statement issued immediately after the raid, the Israeli military warned that “This operation will be continued, expanded and intensified as much as will be required.”

    “We face a period that will be neither easy nor short, and will require determination and perseverance until the necessary change is achieved in the situation in the south,” Ehud Barak, the Israeli Defence Minister, said.

    Ads by Google

    In Waco, Texas, where President Bush is vacationing, a White House spokesman, Gordon Johndroe, said: “Hamas must end its terrorist activities if it wishes to play a role in the future of the Palestinian people. The United States urges Israel to avoid civilian casualties as it targets Hamas in Gaza.”

    President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt said in a statement, “Egypt condemns the Israeli military aggression on the Gaza Strip and blames Israel, as an occupying force, for the victims and the wounded.”

    At Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, scores of dead bodies were laid out in front of the morgue waiting for family members to identify them. At the Gaza City police station, at least 15 traffic police who had been training in a courtyard were killed on the spot.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Obama's stand on crisis in gazaBy: shahrokh | 29-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward I have contemplated on Mr. Obamas remarks at the start of the Israeli attacks on Ghaza when he was saying that he would have probably done the same as Israelis if his two daughter's lives were endangered by rocket fires. I am quoting Mr. Obama's pre-innaguration meeting with Israelis that was broadcasted by CNN. I have some thing to say about this and that is : Mr. President, I would not kill hundreds of innocent civilians including women and children and destroy structures and livelihoods of an entire city just to protect my two daughters from possible attacks from an enemy. And I personally don't think your two daughters are cute enough to justify your earlier stand on this issue.
    Isreali War CrimeBy: Sahir | 31-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Israel's bombardment of Gaza bears all the hallmarks of war crimes, In the context of total aerial supremacy, in which one side in a conflict deploys lethal aircraft against opponents with no means of defending themselves, the bombardment bears all the hallmarks of war crimes. The attacks, in retaliation for rockets fired by the Palestinians, would not contribute to the security of Israel, "It is a blight not only on the Middle East, but on the entire world - and particularly world leaders who have consistently failed the people of Palestine and Israel over the past 60 years." More than 270 people were killed in the attacks on Saturday.
    ISRAELI ATTACKS CONDEMNEDBy: NAVEED AHMED AWAN | 31-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward I ASK ONE QUESTION, WHY NOT AMERICA AND OTHER POWERS ARE ABLE TO STOP THE ISRAELI ATTACKS ON GHAZA...THE ANS IS THAT THESE POWERS WATNS TO STRENGTHEN THE POWER OF ISRAEL...THE ROLE OF THE WROLD IS MIGHT IS RIGHT ...THE MUSLIMS MUST BE UNITE AND HELP GHAZA AND ATTACKS GHAZA.
    TerrorBy: Sahir | 29-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Normative rules are determined by power relations. Those with power determine what is legal and illegal. They besiege the weak in legal prohibitions to prevent the weak from resisting. For the weak to resist is illegal by definition. Concepts like terrorism are invented and used normatively as if a neutral court had produced them, instead of the oppressors. The danger in this excessive use of legality actually undermines legality, diminishing the credibility of international institutions such as the United Nations. It becomes apparent that the powerful, those who make the rules, insist on legality merely to preserve the power relations that serve them or to maintain their occupation and colonialism as in the case of Israel.
    TerrorrismBy: Sahir | 29-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Terrorism is a normative term and not a descriptive concept. An empty word that means everything and nothing, it is used to describe what the Other does, not what we do. The powerful – whether Israel, America, Russia or China – will always describe their victims' struggle as terrorism, but the destruction of Chechnya, the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, the slow slaughter of the remaining Palestinians, the American occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan – with the tens of thousands of civilians it has killed … these will never earn the title of terrorism, though civilians were the target and terrorising them was the purpose
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.