Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

2007 blasts case: Court issues showcause to policemen

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The special court hearing the case of serial blasts in November 2007 issued showcause notices to the Deputy Inspector General of Police and the Special Superintendent of Police of Lucknow, asking them to explain why the prosecuting agency was not cooperating with the court.

    The court noted that despite summons, prosecution witness Chiranjeev Nath Sinha, a police officer posted in Lucknow, had not appeared before the court for the fourth time. Taking a serious view of Sinha's disobedience, the court of Additional District Judge Laxmi Kant Shukla observed that only because of Sinha's continued absence, the trial of the accused, who are in jail, is lingering.

    Prosecution counsel Aasha Ram Chaudhry said the court, in its showcause notice, has asked senior police officers why it should not take legal action against Sinha. Following a request from the accused, the court also ordered the jail administration to ensure availability of water and Urdu newspapers and arrange "Iftar" for them. A series of near-simultaneous blasts had ripped through court complexes in Lucknow, Faizabad and Varanasi on November 23, 2007.

    Ads by Google

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.