You are here: IE »   Story

22 references to Atal, none flattering

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • A B Vajpayee
    Vajpayee figures as Number 7 in the list of 68 held responsible for pushing the country to the 'brink of communal discord.'
    Discount UK Shopping

    Calling former Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee one of the party’s “pseudo-moderates” — along with L K Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi — the Liberhan Commission makes several references to Vajpayee bracketing him with his hardline colleagues when it came to the demolition of the Babri Masjid.

    Indeed, Vajpayee figures as Number 7 in the list of 68 held responsible for pushing the country to the “brink of communal discord.”

    There are at least 22 references to Vajpayee in the over 1029-page report but the most critical ones are in Chapter 14, titled Conclusions.

    “The Commission is unable to hold even these pseudo moderates innocent of any wrongdoing. It cannot be assumed even for a moment that L K Advani, A B Vajpayee or M M Joshi did not know the designs of the Sangh Parivar,” Justice M S Liberhan writes on page 942.

    The report goes on to say that former party ideologue K Govindacharya’s description of Vajpayee as BJP’s mukhauta (mask) could in fact be applied to all the three leaders together. It says that though these three were the public face of the organization, they hardly were in control of the situation.

    Ads by Google

    “On one hand, the leaders like A B Vajpayee, Murli Manohar Joshi and L K Advani, who are the undeniable public face and leaders of the BJP and thus, of the Parivar, constantly protested their innocence and denounced the events of December 1992. On the other hand, it stands established beyond doubt that the events of the day were neither spontaneous nor unplanned nor an unforeseen overflowing of the people’s emotions.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    BabbriBy: Subhash | 28-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Shahbano case was the turning point.The Congress government clearly to appease the Muslims ammended constitution to turn down Supreme Court verdict. So it was the Congress who cared a damn for the Supreme Court for the sake of muslim votes. The people were wild and as is the custom in India the issue is settled on the street with tit for tat. The BJP did not care for the promise given to the Supreme Court and demolished the Masjid against its instructions caring a damn for it. People whether BJP or non BJP supported this act against their wishes and even elected BJP to Power. BJP, like Congress started Muslim wooing by a bash of Iftar parties Bajpai donning the Muslim cap.We should go into the root cause and think whether coming on street started by Gandhi to solve political problems was good at all for the people.
    Praise for what?By: Hero Vaz | 25-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Why would there be anything flattering about a man who started as a rabble rouser and reached the top by exception? The man has no achievement worth the name to his credit. The following incident shows up the man : When he was Foreign Minister and he was told that the government had fallen, he went hysterical !!!
    Liberhan findingsBy: N.ASTI | 25-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward This does not seem to be an unbiased Commission's report.It is nothing but a political view(in writing) of a political person with a pro-Congress mind,as if an attempt to satisfy Congress at all levels and at all ends.Hence it is evident to be for defaming BJP/Vajpeyi.
    MORE POLITICS THAN RELIGIONBy: R Sundar | 25-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward More than anything, the politicization of the Ram Janmabhoomi issue by the Sangh Parivar for electoral gains has made this more complex. If not for it, I think this could have been easily solved. Nobody knows as to who gave the authority for the RSS and VHP to speak on behalf of Hindus ? If only genuine religious leaders from both the communities had a get together and followed the policy of give and take, this issue could have been resolved amicably long back. The BJP took up this issue just to ignite communal passions and whip up sentiments thereby to bolster its vote bank. The irony is that it did succeed in its mission and even came to power. Time has come to frame strict laws in the Country to ban any Party fanning communal passions. If one has to fault somebody, it is the Chief Election commissioner who did not derecognize the BJP inspite of Advani having launched a Rath Yatra embossing a religion symbol on the front.
    MORE POLITICS THAN RELIGIONBy: N.V.SANKARAN | 28-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Yes. The issue has been politicized , but not by the Hindu organizations but by the congress. For people like you, the history of Babri masjid begins only from 1949. But the fact is that the dispute is as old as the masjid itself. The Hindus have been relentlessly trying to restore the Ram Temple back through legal and other means long before the RSS, BJP or other present day Hindu organizations were even born.
    have you given authority for COngress to speak for MuslimsBy: suchithra | 27-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward So have you given authority for Congress to speak for Muslims & minoroties & that too in a land & culture which is alien to them?
    MORE POLITICS THAN RELIGIONBy: Dr S Shankar Singh | 27-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward All parties moreso Congress. Muslims are more sought after because they are sgnificant in numbers and consitute a solid vote bank. They want to be governed not by Indian constitution but by Sharia. In Shahbano case,Using their vote bank clout Muslims had constitution amended. Kindly ponder over who is communal. Hindus are divided along caste line backwards, dalits etc etc. Therefore,caste based parties have emerged on the scene. There are parties thriving on parochial issues like regionalism and language. This is the character of our politics Who do you ban.
    MORE POLITICS THAN RELIGIONBy: Dr S Shankar Singh | 27-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward All parties moreso Congress. Muslims are more sought after because they are sgnificant in numbers and consitute a solid vote bank. They want to be governed not by Indian constitution but by Sharia. In Shahbano case,Using their vote bank clout Muslims had constitution amended. Kindly ponder over who is communal. Hindus are divided along caste line backwards, dalits etc etc. Therefore,caste based parties have emerged on the scene. There are parties thriving on parochial issues like regionalism and language. This is the character of our politics Who do you ban.
    MORE POLITICS THAN RELIGIONBy: Dr S Shankar Singh | 27-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward All parties moreso Congress. Muslims are more sought after because they are sgnificant in numbers and consitute a solid vote bank. They want to be governed not by Indian constitution but by Sharia. In Shahbano case,Using their vote bank clout Muslims had constitution amended. Kindly ponder over who is communal. Hindus are divided along caste line backwards, dalits etc etc. Therefore,caste based parties have emerged on the scene. There are parties thriving on parochial issues like regionalism and language. This is the character of our politics Who do you ban.
    ReplyBy: BM | 25-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward There are different comments by you Mr. So called Indian. one is on the mask of Mr. VAjpeyee and other is progress compared china and yet another is comparision between Muslim and Hindu terrorist. Firstly, the Mask- Till the leberhan told the word 'Psuedo moderate' entire nation was respecting him as person with high values. Just because one person calling him psuedo who wont become that. Next thing Lebrahan has relied on the statment of another politicia's words to call him to temrm AB as psuedo. this is pathetic. Coming on to comaprision with China- China does not have different policies with regard to chinees muslims chinees buddhists etc. law is same for evey one. China first and the relious favours next. Look at the contrast we have Muslim personal law governing muslims and Hindu Law as amended to suit all which is governign hindus. People of other community protest over Common civil code. Govt. comes first to amend the law to override the decision in shabhano's case. Comi
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.