Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

24-yr-old sepoy was beheaded in 2000 LoC raid

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Nine years after a young Indian soldier on duty at the Line of Control was beheaded and seven of his colleagues killed in a cross-border raid, the Pakistani militant who owned up for the act was reported killed in a US drone strike in North Waziristan last week.

    Indian Army records show that the man who was beheaded in 2000 was Sepoy Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar of the 17 Maratha Light Infantry (MLI).

    Ilyas Kashmiri, according to a report in the Pakistani daily The News, was behind the guerilla attack on an Indian Army post in Nowshera sector in February 2000.

    Kashmiri, a Harkat-ul-Jehad al-Islami (HuJI) commander, was said to have been felicitated by then Army chief General Pervez Musharraf and rewarded with Rs 1 lakh for bringing back “the head of an Indian officer”.

    According to records here, Talekar, the 24-year-old soldier from Maharashtra, was posted at a border listening post — the 24-yr-old sepoy was beheaded in 2000 LoC raid

    Ads by Google

    Ashok LP post in Rajouri district — that was surrounded by three Pakistani posts when it was attacked in the early hours of February 27, 2000 by Pakistani troops and irregulars.

    The incident took place at time when the two armies were lodged in an intense exchange of fire — small arms and artillery — that was taking place all along the LoC.

    Talekar was on guard duty at the post when a guerilla attack was launched under the cover of heavy mortar and rocket fire from Pakistani positions. He was also the first casualty of the raid — Army reports say his throat was slit by the enemy in a sneak action following which the attackers opened fire inside the bunker, killing seven jawans.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Will the media visit the home of the SOILDER ????By: rajdeep-e-burkha | 23-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Shall the MEDIA visit the house of the solider in question,or talk to his family,Shall this news get the prominence that a silly story of a " GUDIA EPISODE " of a solider a few years back got?. Is the honor of the country or the dignity of a solder less important than the episode of a solder involved in shairat law more important ? Who rund the electronic media ? greed,foreign money?.This incidence could have given a good TRP rating.Guru Dutt was right "jenhe naaz hai hind par who kahan hai"
    history repeatedBy: anup | 22-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward history repeated again..in 1999, 11 BSF jawans was brutally killed by bangladesh rangers at assam and bangal borders.nothing done for that.i don't know why, but nobody even remember that event the next day,,,let me tell u the bitter truth that,, this happen many a times to us.and we fool are fighting for our nation...yes we ll fight.but ohh dear politician at least have shame ....
    tell us whyBy: sathish_kodali | 21-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Anup,please tell us why. My be that will change one man in India
    NoBy: Khalil | 22-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Our army did not do anything.As always, the army needs the permission of the spineless politicians to even kill a fly.If you think the army retaliated for this killing you are delusional.Nothing happened.Nobody cared.It took 9 years to kill this barbarian and that too we did not do it.The US did.There is something terribly wrong with our establishment.No country is so spineless.It seems we have lost our will to act.Only reacting seems to be the norm of today.
    Beheading of Indian SoldierBy: Sandy | 22-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Yet another example of brutality at the hands of Pakistani regulars and irregulars. This is not the 1st time and must not be condoned at any levels. While this is not how IA behaves and treats it's captors or enemy combatants. However, given the fact we live in a hostile environment we should give them back in the same coin so that they know what they do to our soldiers they will be paid in back the same way. Enough is enough, how long will we tolerate this and other acts of aggression on our soldiers and civilians. We should set example for aggressors, we should not give the impression of a weak or soft nation that will accept anything and everything. Gone are the days of AHIMSA!! HINSA has to be replied with HINSA when you deal with these kind of people.Passive policy doesn't seems to be functioning, we need aggressive policy, we should relent NO USE Policy and have our enemies understand that we will obliterate them if they don't change their attitude towards India.
    defendBy: anif | 23-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward I LOVE MY COUNTRYSO MUCH, im a muslim i would suggest our army need more muslim souldier in our country as i cannot be muslim if i dont love my country muslims are brought to our beatiful country many things even oscar awards muslims of INDIA BHARATH, will sacrifice for the country BELIEVE MY FRENDS , REALLY BEGGING TO YOU ALL CONCENED.
    national shameBy: abhay singh | 22-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward this type of incidences are national shame for us..it shows that v all have lost self esteem somwhere...nine year have passed and now v are coming to know about this..and most unfortunate thing is that it is not making any impact on our polititions and baabus..time has come to think about it..before electing such polititions for whome lives of our brave solders means nothing.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.