Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

26/11 bullets still fresh, seat is ready for ballot

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Mumbai-South was a complex enough place to begin with — home to some of India’s richest and most famous, whose bedrooms overlooked slums of Oscar-winning poverty. Delimitation threw in the crumbling, eight-people-a-room chawls along with machchhimaar colonies and the former mill lands. Then came the events of last November, which completely changed the political discourse of not just Mumbai-South, but of all India.

    It’s been five months, and the anger hasn’t gone away. Will it translate into a new voting pattern in a city capable of forgetting tragedies quickly?

    In her posh Marine Drive home, barely a kilometre from where her son and daughter-in-law died at the Oberoi, 75-year-old Sarla Parekh explains why the terrorist attacks must move electors famous for their political indifference.

    Parekh, who backed a post-attack PIL in the Bombay High Court seeking better security and has set up with her friends a forum called ‘Citizens Take Charge’, has been telling Mumbai-South’s Rotarians, chartered accountants and businessmen why it is important to vote. “I tell people we’ve failed by not voting,” Parekh says. But she is convinced things will be different this time.

    Ads by Google

    Former commissioner of Mumbai Police Julio Ribeiro — who is also on the board of ‘Citizens Take Charge’ — agrees, predicting that the class that has traditionally never voted “will come out in large numbers” to demand better protection from terrorism.

    But the professional politicians don’t think so. And it is significant that none of the candidates has offered a new argument on security.

    For Shiv Sena’s Mohan Rawle, the only non-Congress/NCP sitting MP in Mumbai, the Sena’s promise of 80 per cent reservation in jobs for locals could be the deciding factor. MLA Bala Nandgaonkar, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena candidate, explains Mumbai-South is no longer the elite constituency it once was. The addition of the Shivdi and Worli Assembly segments has meant over 5 lakh new voters, all from the erstwhile Girangaon textile hub.

    Congress’s US- educated Milind Deora faces Rawle in a “Malabar Hill-versus-Marathi manoos” clash. Mumbai-South’s new areas are largely dominated by the Shiv Sena’s brand of politics. Deora, whose main agenda has been infrastructure and central funds for Mumbai, says attempts to label 26/11 an attack on South Mumbai are “typical of the Sena, to regionalise issues”.

    Deora does not deny his voters are outraged with the failures 26/11 showed up. “People are definitely upset. But they are upset with politicians in general, not just with the Congress.”

    Yet, discernible this time is a refreshing move to shake off Mumbai-South’s political lethargy. Banker Meera Sanyal decided to contest mainly due to the 26/11 attacks, during which her friend and one-time colleague Ashok Kapur of Yes Bank was killed.

    Mumbai South, Maharashtra

    Candidates

    Milind Deora, Congress

    Mohan Rawle, shiv sena

    MLA Bala Nandgaonkar, MNS

    Mohammed Ali Shaikh, BSP

    BACK STORY

    2004 Milind Deora, Cong

    1999 Jaywantiben Mehta, BJP

    1998 Murli Deora, Cong

    1996 Jaywantiben Mehta, BJP

    1991 Murli Deora, Cong

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.