Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

26/11: Pak gives dossier on what it's done, what it needs

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Mumbai attacks

    Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani on Thursday morning.

    The talks between the two Foreign Secretaries and the Prime Ministers is yet another step that hopes to help resume the peace process, suspended after the attack on the Indian Embassy in Kabul last year.

    However, India remains adamant about the need for concrete action from Pakistan to address New Delhi’s concerns and the past will not be dumped for history to repeat itself, the sources said. As a result, India is not thinking ahead of itself and has adopted a wait-and-watch attitude, clearly not in a position to take a stand on whether the composite dialogue should resume or not.

    In fact, some sections in the establishment feel that the two countries are “far away” from actually taking a firm call on the dialogue. There are no clear markers or milestones set that say if Pakistan takes a particular step, India will reciprocate with something specific. Incidentally, Pakistan is also not insisting on making the composite dialogue the only means of resuming engagement with India although Islamabad sticks to that stand in public.

    Ads by Google

    The Pakistani leadership continues to repose faith in the mechanism of the composite dialogue but it does not also say at the same time that these talks are the only way for the two countries to move forward.

    Separately, India feels that Pakistan should not take shelter under legal arguments and the opinion of its Supreme Court about acting against Lashkar founder Hafiz Saeed because the UN resolution for action against his Jamat-ud-Dawa does not call for imprisoning him. For New Delhi, there is no doubt about Saeed’s culpability and Pakistan is obliged to act against him as a “normal, decent, civilized” nation.

    Previous12
    26/11: Pak gives dossier on what it's done, what it needsBy: Dr.R.K.D.Goel | 15-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward We should send Prof. J.S. Bandukwala, a Doctorate in Nuclear Physics who is based Vadodara. He is the Victim of post Godha riots of 2002 of Gujarat. He is a awardee of Indra Gandhi Communal Harmony. He knows well what to speek in these August Bodies. He can defend well the indian position. He is a scoolar and well versed with Islam.He can give good dose to our old politicians those are representing the Forum and not in a position to Warn the threats of Pakistan LeT and other Terrorists groups.
    Paki humbugsBy: Hero Vaz | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The Paki dossier will not have a single truth in it. That is what Islamic Pak has sunk to. Pak has brought a bad name to Islam. The rot started with hypocrite Mush who did every unislamic thing and claimed that he was a good Muslim and a champ of the Muslim Ummah!!! The Pakis pretence at honesty can be seen through, easily.
    Most of our elders are old and have no courage to speakBy: freddie (Indian) | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward First of all why should our ministers should meet pakistan minister is it because we are scared of pakistan. Most of our elders are old and afraid to speak because are worried that their falls teeth may fall off. We do not have a elder who can open their broad shoulder and speak boldly at the international venue. Most of our old elders are afraid of USA and that is the reason pakistan is taking advantage of this by doing double speech. Rahul Gandhi got no qualification that is the reason he as landed himself in politics so that he can fool the Indian public.
    Against ProtocolBy: Appan Menon | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Though he is called Prime Minister in Pakistan, Mr. Gilani is not equal to Manmohan Singh. Pakistani Prime Minister is not equal to Indian Prime Minister. If Zardari is so peeved that he cannot meet Manmohan Singh, we should send Krishna to talk to Gilani. Our Foreign Office should be more alert. This is not an informal meeting.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.