Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

26/11 trial may be delayed again

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Kasab
    There have been allegations that Anjali Waghmare had first accepted brief of a witness in 26/11 case before deciding to defend Kasab.

    Judge M L Tahilyani is yet to pass an order in connection with the issue, which is likely to be a centre of attention during the proceedings in the special court on Wednesday, specially set up in the Arthur Road Central prison, under high security.

    A complaint has also been filed with the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa against Waghmare alleging that she was guilty of "professional misconduct" by accepting briefs of witness and accused in the same case.

    The complaint filed by Sachin Vaze, former cop and Shiv Sena activist alleged that she had violated rule 14 of Bar Council of India rules.

    "The Bar Council has not yet decided my complaint. I have talked to the witness who had categorically informed that Waghmare had signed the vakalatnama," Vaze said and claimed he had seen the document signed by the lawyer.

    Earlier, Waghmare had earned the wrath of Shiv Sena activists for accepting the brief of Kasab after she was appointed by the court to defend him. Party workers had raised slogans outside her house at Worli, prompting the police to provide her security.

    Ads by Google

    Previous12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.