377 different arguments

Font Size

Vinay Sitapati Posted: Sep 27, 2008 at 2348 hrs IST

Print Email Feedback Discuss

Speaking to a packed Delhi High Court room on Friday, the additional solicitor general, P.P. Malhotra, said: “Legalising homosexuality will increase the spread of AIDS.” Just a week earlier, the Union health minister — and qualified doctor — Anbumani Ramadoss publicly stated that de-criminalising homosexuality would, in fact, help prevent the spread of AIDS.

Permitting sex between consensual adults seems a task for a just-demised-theocracy newly empowering its citizens, not an established liberal democracy like India. But the evil that some men do seems to live on. Drafted by Lord Macaulay in 1860, with Victorian certainty, Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code criminalises “carnal intercourse against the order of nature”. Subsequent courts have held this to include consensual sodomy, in effect criminalising homosexuality in India.

England, now Macaulay-less, has moved on: not only de-criminalising homosexuality, but even providing legitimacy to same-sex unions. But in India, homosexuality is viewed with suspicion; despite, according to a Government study, 23 lakh people falling within the category. Political calculations — evident in ASG Malhotra’s response to court — have ensured that Section 377 has remained on the statute books. Though hardly anyone has been prosecuted for consensual sex under Section 377, it has proved a handy tool for truculent families or crooked cops to blackmail and illegally detain homosexuals.

Ads By Google

A hundred and forty eight years on, the validity of Section 377 is being debated at the Delhi High Court. In Naz Foundation vs Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi, the petitioners — gay rights NGOs — seek to “read down” Section 377, so that it does not apply to sexual acts between consenting adults, while still being used to protect minors and non-consenting adults. They are arguing that Section 377 is unconstitutional, and denies basic human rights to LGBTs (lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transexuals). Mayur Suresh, a bespectacled young lawyer representing a coalition of NGOs calling itself Voices against 377, believes that “medical evidence clearly shows that homosexuality is not changeable. It is not a curable disease.” As Shyam Divan, another lawyer for the coalition, argued in court yesterday, “For many homosexuals, their orientation is at the core of their identity... the moral argument cannot triumph over constitutional rights.” The other NGO involved, the Naz Foundation, has — strategically — employed a more medical argument, arguing that the stigma of illegality makes it very difficult to reach out to LGBTs who are at high risk from AIDS.

... contd.

Ads By Google

1 2 3

Single Page Format

Post Comments

Message*	Maximum characters allowed

Name*		Email ID*
Subject*		Country*

TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).

I agree to the terms of use.

View all Messages [ 3 ]

HIV/AIDS by SHIVA on 2008-10-16 13:06:02.246111+05:30
It is very intresting thing Act 377 offences homosexuality it is halm to men have sex with mens or gays

Reply Forward

Article 377 should go by Yush on 2008-09-27 15:50:44.978595+05:30
I think article 377 equates India with Iran where homosexuality is punishable by death. No matter what law exists, it cannot change sexual orientation of a person - it will marely give a status of legal or illegal to it. In a democracy a law should not be meddling into personal sexual preferences of the citizens if those preferences do not mean forcing themselves on others.

Reply Forward

377 must go by Ashwin on 2008-09-27 09:14:38.906929+05:30
In a free country like India, the Govt should have no business in taking personal decisions taken between two consenting adults in private. The last thing that we need is moral policing. Who is the Govt to decide about Gay and lesbian relationships being immoral? Our country is the most hypocratic one in the whole world. We have over a billion people, the largest HIV population, gave Kama Sutra to the world, have erotic scultpures in our temples and yet say that sex is a perverted western invasion something against our "culture". It is high time Article 377 goes. The freedom, equality and liberty guaranteed under the constitution must be granted to all citizens irrespective of sexual orientation. By enforcing an archaic Victorian era law, the Government will be taking back India to a culturally backward era. The Govt must realize that it is not just enough to make token name changes to Indian cities and streets. It must actively change evil laws

Reply Forward

View all Messages [ 3 ]

Mail this page