Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

377 different arguments

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • VinaySitapati
    Vinay Sitapati

    Opposing this is the Orwellian sounding Joint Action Council, Kannur or JACK. JACK believes that AIDS is a Western myth, created by greedy pharmaceutical companies to sell panaceas for a non-existent malady. Their lawyer, Ravi Shankar Kumar, opposes legalising homosexuality on medical grounds, telling me that there has never been any link established between homosexuality and AIDS. Kumar is not from the Stone Age: he promised to send me a “soft copy” of his statements by email.

    B.P. Singhal, former BJP Member of Parliament, has also intervened to oppose the petition, though his concerns are more moral than medical. Stocky, well-dressed, and with an old-world formal courtesy about him, he has had a long career in the Indian Police Service, and a shorter one as chairman of the Film Censor Board. “Homosexuality is neither congenital nor incurable,” he told me, “and I have placed on record medical evidence about this.” Heating up, he added: “Look at these malls growing all over the place. Don’t you think that our morality is under attack? Anyway, the law will not change anything. Homosexuality is not accepted in society, and that will not change.” Why then, did he care about the judgment? “Legalising gays will be calamitous,” he responded, “It will encourage all kinds of vices... brothels.”

    Ads by Google

    In terms of their legal arsenal, neither Singhal nor JACK seems a match for the committed and better-coordinated NGOs they’re opposing. Producing case after well-researched case, and affidavit after moving affidavit, their research led the Chief Justice to say, “You seem to have gathered much medical evidence that homosexuality is not a disease, unlike the [other side’s] lawyer, who argued in court that ‘homosexuality is a matter of fun’.”

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Homo sexuality-ruin to cultureBy: Anne Princy | 12-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Hi,i would like to share my view regarding legalisation of bisexuality.firstly God hates it.its also against our culture.It is further going to spread many diseases.i am not able to digest such a verdict in India.i very kindly request to take out this type of idea,and not to set it in to force.pl consider the views of our people also be bringing such a ruin to ouerculture.
    go with 377By: vivek rawat | 11-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward We must see the things in practical way.....Can we really face homosexuality in our Indian society?
    GO ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON DELAY FURTHER!!!!By: siddhi | 02-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward i think we should move on with this act and should not delay the matter. we should take care of our fellow beings by respecting their choice of sexual orientation....the govt should not really interfere with the personal CHOICE of an individual...
    HIV/AIDSBy: SHIVA | 16-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward It is very intresting thing Act 377 offences homosexuality it is halm to men have sex with mens or gays
    Article 377 should goBy: Yush | 27-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward I think article 377 equates India with Iran where homosexuality is punishable by death. No matter what law exists, it cannot change sexual orientation of a person - it will marely give a status of legal or illegal to it. In a democracy a law should not be meddling into personal sexual preferences of the citizens if those preferences do not mean forcing themselves on others.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.