Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

377 different arguments

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • VinaySitapati
    Vinay Sitapati

    The government has other ideas. In an earlier affidavit, the home ministry had opposed the petition saying that legalising homosexuality would open the floodgates of delinquent behaviour. But the health minister’s statements arguing for its legalisation through “good judicial verdicts” led the judges to ask for a uniform government stand. ASG Malhotra submitted that today, opposing the petition on the grounds that it would increase the spread of AIDS, give rise to more delinquent behaviour, and was contrary to the beliefs of most Indians. Given a choice between constitutional arguments for according dignity and equality to LGBTs on one hand, and Aids denial coupled with the fear of multiplying brothels on the other, the government it seems, has made the obvious choice! 

    The case continues, with arguments scheduled to end by early October. The judgment, whatever it may be, will likely be challenged in the Supreme Court. I am yet to receive a “soft copy” of JACK’s evidence that proves that AIDS is a Western myth.   

    Ads by Google

    vinay.sitapati@expressindia.com

    Previous123
    Homo sexuality-ruin to cultureBy: Anne Princy | 12-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Hi,i would like to share my view regarding legalisation of bisexuality.firstly God hates it.its also against our culture.It is further going to spread many diseases.i am not able to digest such a verdict in India.i very kindly request to take out this type of idea,and not to set it in to force.pl consider the views of our people also be bringing such a ruin to ouerculture.
    go with 377By: vivek rawat | 11-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward We must see the things in practical way.....Can we really face homosexuality in our Indian society?
    GO ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON DELAY FURTHER!!!!By: siddhi | 02-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward i think we should move on with this act and should not delay the matter. we should take care of our fellow beings by respecting their choice of sexual orientation....the govt should not really interfere with the personal CHOICE of an individual...
    HIV/AIDSBy: SHIVA | 16-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward It is very intresting thing Act 377 offences homosexuality it is halm to men have sex with mens or gays
    Article 377 should goBy: Yush | 27-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward I think article 377 equates India with Iran where homosexuality is punishable by death. No matter what law exists, it cannot change sexual orientation of a person - it will marely give a status of legal or illegal to it. In a democracy a law should not be meddling into personal sexual preferences of the citizens if those preferences do not mean forcing themselves on others.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.