Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

90% seat plan for state board students

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • University
    The government has worked out yet another formula to relax the competition for state board students.
    Ahead of the admission season, the government has worked out yet another formula to relax the competition for state board students: reservation of 90 per cent of the seats at junior colleges.

    Education Minister Radhakrishna Vikhe Patil announced the proposal in the assembly on Monday and said the feedback from all political parties was positive. If it works this year, it will be implemented next year too, he said.

    The move follows the controversy over last year’s “percentile” system, which has run into legal trouble. Under a formula introduced by then education minister Vasant Purke, students were selected according to “percentile” instead of percentage.

    But ICSE and CBSE schools alleged loopholes in the method for calculating the percentile for each board. Further, when the announcement that the system would be followed came, admission had already begun.

    Ads by Google

    The parents of an ICSE student moved the Bombay High Court. In September, the High Court quashed the government resolution on the percentile system and asked the state government to arrive at a consensus solution.

    The government continued to look for other formulas with the same objective. The argument was that SSC (state board) students needed a better break. There are huge variations between boards in terms of scores; the government feels that ICSE and CBSE have a more high-scoring system and their students are at an advantage over their SSC counterparts.

    One formula considered was that the five highest-scoring subjects of each SSC student would be considered for calculating the percentile. However, this was eventually rejected.

    Having embarked on the reservation idea, the government has sought to pre-empt trouble. Patil assured that unlike last year, the announcement would be made well before the admission season. “We still have to look at all the legalities and then arrive at a decision. We are still in discussion,” said Patil.

    The proposal itself has rattled ICSE and CBSE schools. Ayush Dhanuka, who passed ICSE this year with 88 per cent, said, “Reserving 90 per cent of seats for SSC students is unfair. Admission should go on like it has been happening every year. Everybody should have equal opportunity.”

    In The field
    2 lakh

    students passed SSC last year

    25,000
    students passed ICSE and CBSE from Mumbai this year

    1 lakh
    hits during admission website trail run (above), big rush likely

    WTFBy: ndjnjkn | 09-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Try improving the quality instead of messing around with others lives will you mr uneducation minister?
    educationBy: richard | 09-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Why do parents want to educate their children? What do they learn in schools and colleges? Their contribution to the development of our Indian unity is becoming less and less. More and more jobs are getting reserved on the strength of their community, language and region? Instead, the parents should encourage their children to join some political parties and become excellent street fighters. Then one day with the blessings of politically powerful gods, they can dream of becoming state and union ministers. If they do not, they can keep on throwing stones till they achieve their goal.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.