Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Angry HC fines Gutkha firm for wanting to hire ‘retired judges with contacts’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The DS Group, a business “conglomerate” which also sells gutkha, was left with a bad taste in the mouth Wednesday after the Delhi High Court slapped a fine of Rs 1 lakh for putting out an employment advertisement inviting “retired judges with contacts in the judiciary” as its “Head – Legal”.

    The advertisement, which appeared in the Power Jobs column of Hindustan Times and on job website naukri.com on September 4, 2007, said the company — DS Group — required as “Head – Legal” a candidate whose profile “must be LLB, LLM or a retired judge with contacts in the judiciary”. The firm insisted that only those candidates with at least 12 to 15 years experience in the legal field should contact them at their Noida office.

    The material was first spotted by a Delhi High Court lawyer Sunita Tiwari. “I was shocked to find the advertisement in Hindustan Times. It took me an entire day to believe that they were actually inviting retired judges as their employees,” said Tiwari who initiated action against the DS Group.

    Ads by Google

    The next day, Tiwari went to court against the “business house” she described as “a multi-crore company with popular brands like Catch Spring Water, Catch Flavoured Water, PassPass, Rajnigandha, Baba Zarda, Tulsi gutkha, etc”.

    Her petition asked the court to move against the firm’s “belief” that “having contacts in the judiciary helps in better management of its business”.

    The case saw DS (Dharampal Satyapal) Group, Shveta Khanna (featured as the group’s contact person in the advertisement), Info-Edge (India) Ltd, which runs the website naukri.com, and the Hindustan Times Ltd through its Chief Editor arrayed as parties.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Dumb DecisionBy: Sumant | 24-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward What's wrong with hiring retired judges? Industry contacts are common in recruitment, and as long as they don't influence decisions, it's not against the law. This fine is ludicrous.
    Good response from JudiciaryBy: KVSKumar, Mumbai | 23-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Kudos Delhi High Court for this act. But I must confess that this fine is nothing but peanut for the Gutka barron. The HC should have fined them with a few crores. The money in any case would come handy for computerization and improving the working conditions of our judiciary which will ultimately benefit the comman man in the form of speady trial and deliverance. I request the judges to keep this in mind when confronting such blatent irresponsibility by those with money and muscle power.
    good action by Sunita TiwariBy: Manish Kumar Joddar | 23-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward This is a very good. The society should support lawyer Sunita TIwari for the action she has taken this should be a lesson for such firms so that they refrain form doing such things in fututeManish Joddar
    1Lac fineBy: Vinay | 23-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Only 1 Lac fine as they apoligised
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.