Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Antony pitches for two key pay demands of Services, pulls up Navy chief again

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Navy chief Admiral Sureesh Mehta, who sent out an unclassified signal on September 24 to all naval officers and ranks on withholding implementation of the Sixth Pay Commission salary recommendations, is learnt to have been pulled up again by Defence Minister A K Antony for the manner in which he, as Chairman of Chiefs of Staff Committee, led the other two chiefs — General Deepak Kapoor and Air Chief Marshal Homi Major — in virtually attacking the establishment.

    This is the third time Admiral Mehta has been pulled up by Antony in recent months — earlier, he was pulled up for his remarks over the build-up of Chinese submarines.

    It is learnt that while Antony has agreed to look into grievances, even push in Parliament the “demands” of the armed forces over pay, he is upset by the way Admiral Mehta dealt with the matter. After being almost nudged by Admiral Mehta to “refuse” implementation of the pay panel report, the armed forces did not submit their revised salary slips to the Ministry’s accounts office.

    Ads by Google

    Antony is part of a three-member panel — the others are Pranab Mukherjee, the panel head, and P Chidambaram — tasked to look into the pay anomalies. On September 26, he had an uncharacteristic tough talk with the three chiefs. He is now said to have conveyed to Mukherjee that the Government has agreed in principle to the Services’ demand for restoring 70 per cent “extant pensionary weightage” to jawans on the basis of their last drawn pay.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    World of FogsBy: Yogi Singh | 06-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Losers, weepers!!!
    Antony pitches for two key pay demands of Services, pulls up Navy chief againBy: Ranjana | 06-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Its unfortunate that the Mr Antony is behaving like a frustrated juvenile,after allowing the situation to deteriorate to this level.Instead of pulling up the chiefs he should urge the PM to initiate an inqiury to investigate the bunglings of the Babus who on their own decided to get themselves more increments beyond the approval of the cabinet.
    Pay demands By: Premchand | 06-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward One cannot blame the army chiefs for the stand they took. The political establishment is prone to overlook or delay matters and Mr.Antony is no exception.
    Antony pitches for two key pay demands of servicesBy: murty | 06-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Thats agood show by Navy chief.The civil administration understand nothing but defiance.They see no sense in the requirement of Armed forces.Once the defiance started they dont know what to do.The cunning beaurocrats shamelessly can cheat the Armed forces once again.Watch out for their next cunning act
    babuBy: victor | 06-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward This time the editor does not want to put his name against the article , thats some development. What is right is right .Unfortunately the politician has been made to believe that there interest are being looked after the Babu but the day he learns that he is putting his interest even above the country leave alone the politician the matters will improve but it will take long time , the malaise has set in hard to thaw it will require blow torch or maybe a furnace
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.