You are here: IE »   Story

BJP chief backs Sadhvi: ‘there’s no evidence’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    Claiming that an “Arushi-like” case was being built against her, BJP president Rajnath Singh has come out in defence of Sadhvi Pragya Singh, accused of murder in the Malegaon blasts that killed five Muslims after Ramzan prayers on September 29.

    He was alluding to the Arushi Talwar murder case where the father of the 14-year-old Noida schoolgirl, was picked up by the UP police and then subsequently released for lack of any evidence.

    Asked about the other arrests in the case, including those of two alleged accomplices of Sadhvi and a retired Army major, he said: “I am not aware of any arrests other than Pragya’s. Anyone who believes in the ideology of cultural nationalism cannot ever be a terrorist.”

    Although Rajnath’s remarks are echoed by several BJP leaders in private conversations, these mark a departure from the official calibrated reaction of the party and the Sangh Parivar ever since the arrests — first reported in The Indian Express — by the Maharashtra Police.

    Ads by Google

    Their refrain so far has been that the law “should take its course” and that “terror has no religion.” Many other Sangh leaders have denied any knowledge of her association with the party although her father has claimed that Pragya — a former member of the national executive of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, the RSS students’ wing — campaigned for the BJP in the 2002 Gujarat Assembly elections.

    But the BJP president is the first senior party leader to openly attack the case against her. Speaking to The Indian Express today, he said: “I don’t think that she is a terrorist. They didn’t find any material evidence against her despite the raids. Had they got even a shred of evidence against her, they would not have insisted on a narco test.” The court last week approved her narco and brain-mapping.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Twist not to suit your pupose!By: Nyayman | 20-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Rajnathji! On 30th October, you said that you are "embarrassed" to be seen in the same frame of a photo with sadhvi Pragya Thakur!Once you learnt that your master-RSS -has decided to stand by sadhvi,you too have taken a U-turn! You say that BJPhas always believed that there is no link between religion and terror.Then who coined the phrase:"jehadi terror"? Why not others call yours the "saffran terror"!Evidence has to be placed in the court during trial only. It could non be placed before your exalted Highness!You r part cannot succeed this time trying to arouse Hindu sympathy to garner votes.People have "realized" that 'religion'is the ploy your party uses for election purposes only
    to call Rajnath's bluffBy: AKM | 31-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Look at the man of his stature BJP President makes comparison of this case with a Arushi's murder only because Sadhvi was photograph with him and to save his skin. It is really shameful to talk like this and must not think all Hindus are angels as not all Muslims are. Muslims have not forgotten Muradabad riots on Edd day and thousands of Muslim were killed when they went for prayer in a mosque. Was it not your Sangh?
    rajnath has not answer. Therefore, he is messing the issueBy: real bharatiya | 30-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward mr. rajnathji, u must listened speeches of sadhvi pragya when her tongue is blasting fire of haterd. It is more danger than Al-Quida. bjp defence to sadhvi show 80 % Hindu apeasement. bjp knows that no party can ignore 80% Hindus while bjp blaming on Cong of 15% muslim apeasement. See the difference btwen 80% Hindus
    TerrorismBy: Evid | 30-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward We want tp remove hiduism from India by converting them to christians then Muslims and Chrostians will fight and that will be the third world war. After that Hinduism will be the only "world religion"
    Loose talkBy: Daniel | 30-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward What rubbish, Rajnath Singh. Just because the police has caught someone from a particular committee doesn't make the person innocent. I can't understand the thought "ideology of cultural nationalism cannot ever be a terrorist". These cultural nationalist preaches hate, divide people on religious lines, instigate people to riot. I consider anyone who preaches violence and hate as the biggest terrorists.
    RE:LOOSE TALKBy: Fatherofdaniel | 31-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward might be for u it is rubbish, but for 80% of the religion who is under constant threat from a particular ideology and bearing itsdeadly brunt from last 50 years has to respond in their on words i totally agree with both pragya thakur
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.