Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

CBI says 2 arrested from Nepal not linked to blasts

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The special TADA court on Monday directed the CBI to release two persons arrested from Nepal in connection with the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts case after the agency admitted that it was a case of “mistaken identity.”

    The CBI on Monday informed the court that the two persons, who were arrested by the Nepal police and then extradited to India under the pretext of them being two of the 127 accused in the 1993 blasts case, were indeed the wrong persons and it was a case of mistaken identity.

    The CBI had produced the two before the TADA court saying that they were Salim Abdul Ghani Gazi and Riyaz Khatri, who had an Interpol Red Corner notice issued for their arrest in 1997. But the agency on Monday took a U-turn and said the arrested persons had no connection with the blasts.

    “We wanted Salim Gazi and Riyaz Khatri, instead the Nepal police deported Asfak Tak and Riyaz Lone. It’s an honest error on the part of the Nepal police,” said public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam. Nikam said both the arrested have no past criminal background and hence should be released at the earliest.

    Ads by Google

    Designated TADA judge D U Mulla ordered that both Tak and Lone be immediately released and directed the CBI to make their travel arrangements. In its application, the CBI has also stated that both the persons would be flown back to Nepal and the cost would be borne by the agency.

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.