Premium
This is an archive article published on May 28, 2009

Cargo robbery: police cite shortage of manpower to secure airport city side

As the third day passed by without any major breakthrough in the investigation into the airport robbery incident,the airport police told Newsline that there was serious shortage of manpower at the station to secure the city-side area of the airport.

As the third day passed by without any major breakthrough in the investigation into the airport robbery incident,the airport police told Newsline that there was serious shortage of manpower at the station to secure the city-side area of the airport. After 26/11 attacks,Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel were also roped in to help the Airport police to carry out surveillance.

It is further learnt from airport officials,who work in the airport’s domestic cargo complex,that the Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL) had deployed two guards at the gates of the narrow road that leads to the Jet Airways and Air India cargo sections,but later withdrew them in November last year.

“The heist was carried out in broad daylight and the noise was heard even at this place (Jet cargo area) after the car sped away. The car was then driven through the VIP road (adjoining terminal 2B’s approach road) where a police vehicle was parked. Even outside the terminal building,there was a CISF vehicle with a machine gun. Moreover,the police station is just 50-metre away from the spot where the car sped away it came out on the VIP road. Still nobody could even note down the number of the car,” said a senior cargo airport official.

Story continues below this ad

“We are very much understaffed as far as manpower requirement is concerned. Carrying out surveillance work at the airport is an extremely difficult job,” said an official attached to the airport police station.

While security at the city side of the airport is the responsibility of the airport police,police officials had earlier maintained that some airlines were at fault,as they did not maintain adequate security at their gates. But refuting these charges,airline officials said that there was no mandate given to them either by the police or by MIAL to cordon off areas surrounding their cargo complex. “There was no clear mandate or instruction as to who is responsible for security of this area,” said the official.

The cargo complex,where the heist happened,was shifted to its current location in October last year from the site where construction work for terminal 1C is going on. In its earlier location,MIAL had restricted access to the complex through a booth and used to collect Rs 150 per vehicle as airport entry charges. However,after the shifting the cargo area,a senior cargo official said they do not maintain the records of the vehicles.

“The guards at the gate should ensure that vehicles are not parked in unauthorised areas to avoid clogging of the roads,” said a spokesperson for MIAL. “The guards should maintain traffic in the area. It is not our responsibility to provide security at the airport. What we are here for is to provide the infrastructure and machinery required by the security agency,” he said.

Story continues below this ad

“This (shortage of manpower) is not a problem. What we have to concentrate on is results,” said DCP Airport Division,Nissar Tamboli.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement