Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Common enemy

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • It is no surprise that the US President George W. Bush has chosen to send his Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, to empathise with the Indian people after the terrorist aggression against Mumbai. Rice’s visit, however, has political significance that goes way beyond a mere expression of American solidarity. Rice is likely to set the tone for the global response to the Mumbai attacks. The internationalisation of the gathering India-Pakistan crisis was inevitable because of a number of factors. These include the specific targeting of Western visitors and a Jewish centre in Mumbai, the presence of nuclear weapons in South Asia, and the implications for the situation in Afghanistan, where the US and European troops are fighting a faltering war against terror.

    Cynics would want to see Rice’s visit as an effort to discourage New Delhi from developing a muscular response to the Mumbai aggression. Over the last decade, in its many confrontations with Islamabad, New Delhi has dealt with Washington in an intensive manner. Whichever way one looks at it, the United States is India’s most important partner in mobilising international pressure on Pakistan to crack down on the well-known anti-India terror groups operating on its soil. India must offer Rice a strong commitment to fully share the evidence and results of its investigations into the Mumbai attack.

    Ads by Google

    In the talks with Rice, India’s most important objective must be to end the many current restrictions on significant counter-terror bilateral cooperation with the US. Residual anti-Americanism in our security establishment has made it less than open; while the US system has been reluctant to engage India on the sources of terrorism inside Pakistan. Given its dependence on the Pakistan army for the war on terror in Afghanistan, Washington has been hesitant to exchange intelligence on terror groups based in Pakistan. From its own experience, Washington now knows that the Pakistan army plays both sides of the street in Afghanistan. For Washington and New Delhi it makes no sense to take a segmented view of the terror groups operating in Afghanistan and India. As they both bleed from terror, India and the US must jointly measure up to the shared security challenges in Afghanistan and Pakistan. New Delhi must contribute more to the international efforts in Afghanistan and the US must assist India in defeating the Pakistan-based terror groups.

    Lack of PerspectiveBy: SSsspp | 02-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Out of nearly a dozen Bomb Blasts in various cities, it is strange to note that suddenly UPA and Indian media have taken notice. Thus far it was just poor SIMI or terrorist Hindus.My guess is the fact that the terrorists asked for UK and US passport holders that has turned against them. Suddenly all the international news media got interested and so too our Babus woke up....... Now this editor is perhaps making US case of how India should act. The reason I try to read Indian Express is what is the INDIAN stand point not what the US is thinking........ Please tell me what do you think is in India's best interest... and dont second guess what Bush thinks......
    I DREAM of ... By: Parthasarathy | 02-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Invariably, violence around the world is intimately linked to the lack of genuine and free methods of redressal of grievances of the population.I DREAM of a day of ...1. ZERO TOLERANCE to CORRUPTION2. ZERO TOLERANCE to COMMUNAL politics3. ZERO TOLERANCE to fake ENCOUNTERS by policemen in J
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.