Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Eternal triangle

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As Prime Minister Manmohan Singh heads to Tokyo and Beijing this week, the contrast between India’s changing relations with Japan and China is bound to come under scrutiny. Quite early on in its tenure, the UPA government had announced plans to simultaneously deepen relations with both the Asian giants, during the quick visits in succession by the then Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi and the Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao in April 2005. Three and a half years later, India and Japan, in their painfully cumbersome way, are ready to expand their relationship. New Delhi and Beijing, in contrast, might have to try and overcome the recent downward slide in their bilateral ties.

    The civilian nuclear agreement has had different effects in the two capitals. The popular anti-nuclear sentiment in Japan and Tokyo’s strong commitment to the non-proliferation regime meant inevitable opposition to American recognition of India’s nuclear exceptionalism; Beijing saw the Indo-US nuclear deal entirely in terms of two balances of power, one involving the United States, China and India, and the other China, India and Pakistan. After intensive diplomatic engagement over three years, New Delhi believed it had promises from China and Japan that they would not come in the way of implementing the Indo-US nuclear deal. Last month’s dramatic Nuclear Suppliers Group meeting made it obvious that Japan kept its word while China did not. As a consequence, Dr Singh’s engagement with the Japanese and Chinese leaders this week will be in very different tones. In Tokyo, Dr Singh’s emphasis will be on advancing a strategic partnership. In Beijing, he will hope to limit the damage to the bilateral relationship.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    China cant be ignored because it is political capitalBy: santosh.valipe | 21-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Great article. The 2nd largest economy in the world (japan) cant be compared with China because china is nothing compared with Japan economically atleast today. The political capital of Asia is China because it has a big well trained army and a very big country with communism which makes it a regional hegemone. We have to deal with China in all ways and we can afford to ignore pakistan but we cant afford to ignore China. Japan even gave lot of aid to China, Nevertheless it has been the no.1 FDI for China and responsible for the china boom.
    Japan's later aid to China was insignifant compared with what Japan did to China in the 1930sBy: Sharad Bagchi | 22-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Japan invaded China during the 1930s, tortured 300,000 Chinese civilians to death in the city of Nanking alone, destroyed many Chinese cities and infrastruture, Japan's 731 Unit conducted horrifying biological experiments towards many Chinese civilians, vivisecting human beings without anesthesia... Japan's later aid to China was totally insignificant compared with what Japan burned and destroyed in China during 1930s. and I heard some people said during the 1970s, Japan 'aided' China with inferior products and benefited from business contracts with China.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.