The government’s anodyne reaction over the weekend to the United Nations Security Council’s unanimous imposition of sanctions against Iran’s nuclear weapons programme reflects a poor attempt at fudging the big issues at hand. It is based on the false hope that saying inconsequential things might help avoid confronting the unreasonable and motivated domestic critique of the government’s Iran policy. All indications are that the Iranian question is going to get a lot worse before it gets any better.

Iran’s contemptuous response to the UNSC sanctions is bound to have profound consequences for international and regional security and impinge upon many of India’s vital national interests. Yet New Delhi has chosen to posture in front of the domestic audiences.

When it was first faced with the Iran question at the United Nations General Assembly in September 2005, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the then external affairs minister, Natwar Singh, laid down the essence of India’s two-fold position. First, Iran’s nuclear weapon proliferation is not in India’s national interest. Second, as a responsible nuclear weapon state, India cannot and will not turn a blind eye to Iranian proliferation. These determinations led, in turn, to India voting twice against Iran at the International Atomic Energy Agency, in September 2005 and February 2006.

As it came under attack from the communist parties and other coalition partners, the government began to wobble. Sections of the Congress party too began to point to the dangers of losing electoral support of Muslims. As a result we have a number of non sequiturs from the Foreign Office.

... contd.