Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Leander Paes misses a Slam

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • When Leander Paes agonisingly kicked the Arthur Ashe court on his way out, he was aware that he and Meghann Shaugnessy had blown a 6-2 second set tie-breaker lead to hand Max Mirnyi and Victoria Azarenka the mixed doubles title at the US Open last night. Paes and Meghann lost 4-6, 6-7(6).

    The loss meant he lost out, for the second time, to capture the only mixed doubles title he does not possess. In 2001 Paes, with Lisa Raymond, had lost to Todd Woodbridge and Rennae Stubbs.

    Boasting of seven Grand Slam titles—four men’s doubles and three mixed—Paes admitted that it was “opportunity lost.”

    To get career Grand Slam in doubles, Paes will have to win the men’s doubles in Australia and the mixed at French and the US Open.

    On his partnership with Meghann—who reached her first Slam final—Paes said: “Results speak. We wish to carry forward this run and Meghann is game for it. Meghann was excellent all through this tournament.”

    Ads by Google

    To put Paes’ opinion in perspective, Meghann during the first set did well to return Mirnyi’s 137mph blinder—which incidentally was recorded as the fastest serve of the match.

    Paes said: “I think we had a fair chance to win.” While the Indo-American pair split $70,000 prize money, for Paes it meant playing bridesmaid for the fourth time in the mixed doubles event at Slams—a stat that goes unnoticed.

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.