You are here: IE »   Story

MPhil on par with NET, SET till UGC amendment: UoP

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    The University of Pune (UoP) on Friday clarified that MPhil can be considered on par with the National Eligibility Test or State Eligibility Test until the third amendment of the UGC about cancelling the MPhil criteria to teach at the undergraduate level comes into existence.

    The issue was discussed in the senate meeting presided by acting V-C Arun Adsool. The Bhalchandra Mungekar Committee had made an amendment in June 2006 that the candidates who complete MPhil till June 30, 2009, would be eligible to teach at undergraduate level and could skip the NET/SET. However, on June 1, the UGC said in a notice on its website that MPhil cannot be considered a qualification for teaching. This upset many MPhil candidates, as they did not attempt the NET/SET.

    Senate members argued that the UGC’s notice has not been published in the gazette yet — the UGC has said it would come into effect after its publication. “The UoP should clarify this by issuing a circular, as there is confusion among members of the teachers’ selection panel,” said Shyam Lavande.

    Ads by Google

    However, Adsool said the UoP could not issue any circular in this regard. “The matter was discussed with UGC authorities. However, MPhil will remain the eligibility criteria, subject to change in instructions by the UGC,” he said. On Thursday, R G Sarode of the MPhil action committee had said 20,000 MPhil candidates would suffer if the UGC’s directive was implemented.

    m.phil as the qualificationBy: Sanjeev | 06-Jan-2010 Reply | Forward hi, i also feel that UGC'S Implications regarding M.Phil is not qualified to teach UG will affect many people.in fact i belong to the 1997 batch and am working in a self financing college.already i have 13 years of experience.now if UGC make that M.Phil is not qualified we all will suffer.infact now only in Karnataka they started recruiting lecturers for goverment posting.so it is not correct on the part of UGC to amend this.so it has to be reconsidered this issue.
    Please think By: shirish kulkarni | 20-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward where is UGCs commintment ( exem: 30June 2009)Mphil,Many scholers not attempted for NET/SET . Most of Scholers are working in privite Institute: There is not seure job. If ugc give complusition for NET/SET, Pvt, Institute already give few payment they starting bouther for doing more work in many few money , already there is no any proof for organizations paid less payment to the employee but This is bad but real fact. sir please do the survey and check the records of recruitment in all over India , Mostly Relatatives , & nearlest persones are working in institutes . can i say how is it possible ? perticular one cast is very cleaver or perticular one villege is very cleaver beacuse in that villege 90 % peoples got job. I am shocked in country very much oppourch.. are availiable. when Iam discussed with some professional/ teachers , some are getting salary less than worker who is working in pvt company.
    m.phil as the qualificationBy: g.renuka | 10-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward hi, i also feel that UGC'S Implications regarding M.Phil is not qualified to teach UG will affect many people.in fact we belong to the 1992 batch and am working in a self financing college.already i have 15 years of experience.now if UGC make that M.Phil is not qualified we all will suffer.infact now only in tamilnadu they started recruiting lecturers for goverment posting.so it is not correct on the part of UGC to amend this.so it has to be reconsidered this issue.
    Regarding mphilBy: Seema Sati | 22-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Hi i want to knop whether an MPHIL qualified candidate would be considered equivalent to NET/SLET.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.