Premium
This is an archive article published on October 11, 2011

Montek defends poverty line

Writes to Vahanvati to resist bid to get court to raise benchmark.

Unfazed by criticisms over its affidavit regarding the poverty line,the Planning Commission has decided to stick to its poverty benchmark contending that the level might not be comfortable but it is also “not all that ridiculous from Indian conditions”.

“Social activists have vociferously criticised the latest poverty line of Rs 3,905 for rural areas and Rs 4,824 in urban areas as a ‘cruel joke’ by converting the figures into per person per day i.e.,Rs 26 and Rs 32,respectively. Many people are persuaded by this because they sometimes think of the daily allowance as meant for the family budget. The fact is that Rs 4,824 per month for a family to define is not comfortable but it is not all that ridiculous from Indian conditions,” Deputy Chairperson of the Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia has said in a letter to Attorney General Goolam Vahanvati,who is slated to represent the Commission in a case pertaining to the issue in the next hearing.

While briefing Vahanvati about the background of Commission’s affidavit,Ahluwalia has cautioned him to ward off attempts by the petitioners in the case to get the court to raise the poverty line benchmark on other parameters de-linked from Tendulkar Committee.

Story continues below this ad

“It is possible that some petitioners could request that poverty line be fixed at the minimum wage. This is not possible because wage is ‘income’,whereas official poverty line is defined in terms of ‘consumption’ which is generally lower. Moreover,wage income is for a family and cannot be linked to per capita norms without adjustment for family size,” Ahluwalia has told Vahanvati in his letter.

In the backdrop of Ahluwalia and Rural Development Minister’s joint press conference that the government has delinked the poverty line from the selection of poor beneficiaries coming to be seen as removal of the practice of imposing state-wise ceiling of the number of poor beneficiaries,the Attorney General has been told that Central government’s liability towards supplying highly subsidised foodgrains to poor will be “capped” even though the new poverty ratios will be anchored in the proposed food security law.

In this backdrop,he has also pointed out that while the poor beneficiaries will be identified from the ongoing socio-economic and caste census,their selection will be calibrated to fit the poverty cap fixed in the food security law.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement