You are here: IE »   Story

Rajnath admits: local issues key, not terror, ditto for Lok Sabha

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    As Shivraj Singh Chouhan in Madhya Pradesh and Raman Singh in Chhattisgarh rode back to power on the “development agenda”, BJP president Rajnath Singh, conceding that local issues and not terror had turned out to be the clincher, said that the next Lok Sabha elections too would be decided “primarily on local issues”. But other senior party leaders like former party president M Venkaiah Naidu and general secretary Arun Jaitley said that an anti-terror plank would play a significant role in parliamentary elections.

    “Local issues and Assembly-level candidates counted the most in the state elections,” Rajnath Singh told The Indian Express. “Terror and national security are important but not necessarily for elections. We don’t do politics on the issue of terror. The Lok Sabha elections too would be fought primarily on local issues, where terror may have a tad greater role,” he said.

    Ads by Google

    Jaitley, however, felt that terrorism was, and is, a real issue, but “there was a basket of issues” in the state elections. Naidu too agreed that there would be “no let-up in the party’s anti-terror campaign”. L K Advani, the NDA’s PM candidate, has often said that Lok Sabha elections have come to be known as “an aggregate of local elections in recent years”.

    While the party’s attempt to find an overarching theme in terror in four states may not have yielded results, the BJP nevertheless took took solace in victories in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh where it beat anti-incumbency. “Our governments in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh have come to power on a pro-incumbency wave,” said Jaitley. The party’s loss in Rajasthan was attributed to chief minister Vasundhara Raje’s “disconnect with the organisation” and rebels, but the Delhi loss hit the BJP particularly hard. Rajasthan and Delhi went to elections after the Mumbai terror attack.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    RAJNATH -BJP -AFTERMATH OF ELECTINSBy: s ramji | 09-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Where is Mr Advani - He is not seen the last 2 days--Has he gone to Pakistan to sing praises for Jinnah - People could see what BJP did in Kargil and how it killed hundreds of our soldiers because of its turing a blind eye to the terrorists entering Kargil -Hope Rajnath and Advani have learnt their lessons and hope they will behave maturlly-
    Response to RajnathBy: Dr.T.V.Mathew | 09-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward The mini election clearly reveals that there is no swing in favour of politics of disunity, comunalism,casteism pursued by some political quartrs for vote bank politcs. It reveals that voters prefer people with a vision for development for India in the midst of the global economic meltdown. It also shows that Rahul is not simply a child as projected by some quarters and Rahul effect is inflencing the young and the old to some extent. It also shows the urban voters want development and people with a development agenda and Shela dixit merits attention in this regard.People have expressed their voice against communalism,casteism,regionlism,politics of terror and what not.
    Remember 2004By: Vishnu | 09-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward You can be happy with your own conclusions, if that's going to make you happy!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.