Forgive me if I sound frivolous but I have found hugely entertaining the melodrama over the ‘Sonia Bachao’ ordinance and her resignation. Not just because it is amusing to see the Congress party’s politics of petty revenge boomerang and find its mark in no less a personage than Madame Super Prime Minister herself but also because of the definition of what constitutes an office of profit.

India must have been a very different country in the Fifties for small-time government jobs to be considered offices of profit. In today’s India do we expect anyone to seriously believe that Jaya Bachchan would be making money out of heading the Uttar Pradesh Film Development Council or that Sonia Gandhi makes a fortune in the National Advisory Council? What they could make a lot of money from is being honourable members of Parliament. Now that is a real office of profit.

The reason why everyone from big businessmen to small-time crooks wants to enter politics is because they know that the quickest way to make a quick buck in India is to become a member of Parliament. If proof were needed of this we got it on videotape in the recent television sting operations that showed MPs negotiating the price for asking questions in Parliament and MPs negotiating their commissions on development projects from their local area funds.

The sting operations revealed only the teeniest tip of the tip of what lies beneath. Those of our MPs who are unfettered by moral scruples (alas far too many) can become millionaires at the end of a single term in Parliament and if they are lucky enough to become ministers then the term ‘office of profit’ acquires a whole new meaning. So why was there such a fuss about the ‘Sonia Bachao’ ordinance?

... contd.