A BRIEF HISTORY OF LOST <b>CHANCES</b>

India was treated more subtly. The maharaja of Bikaner, who apparently spoke little but threw excellent cocktail parties, was India’s representative; he formed little lasting impression except perhaps on a young student activist in Hunan province, who berated Britain for choosing as India’s representative a “clown in a flaming red turban”. It was nevertheless to be a member of the League of Nations. This concerned the secretary of state for India, Edwin Montagu: it was “inconsistent with the position of a subordinate country”. The Home Rule League, circulating pamphlets promising to “make the world safe for democracy”, was quite happy. Then the British introduced the Rowlatt Act and optimism blew up into violence.

Manela argues that such rebellions, which flared up in the colonial world in 1919, were all linked to the failure to follow through on the promise of the Wilsonian movement. The book’s emotional climax arrives when the reader is presented with the reactions of those who had trusted in Wilson’s vision: the stunned anger in Cairo, the shocked betrayal in Seoul. Lurking in the shadows was the alternative: the new Bolshevik state in Russia, with an equally charismatic leader actually preaching revolution and resistance — one from whom Wilson had, according to Manela, borrowed the phrase “self-determination”. That student activist in Hunan province, Mao Tse-Tung, turned to Leninism that year; the Indian National Congress abandoned moderation; the Egyptian movement turned decisively anti-American; a kitchen attendant in Paris whose letter Wilson did not read became Ho Chi Minh.

Such are the prices of the failure of liberal internationalism; such is the fallout of unrealistic expectations raised by idealistic presidents — or prospective presidents? — on anti-Americanism, of a gap between rhetoric and action. Manela seems to have chosen not to discuss this directly, but the feel of roads not taken pervades the text. Wilson himself, overwhelmed by the tidal wave of disappointment he feared, suffered a stroke: his last speech was on India’s League membership: “for the first time, that great and voiceless multitude, that throng hundreds of millions strong in India, has a voice among the nations of the world.”
There is little work discussing links between countries in the global south before the 1950s. Nehru’s third-worldism did not emerge in vacuum; each nation’s freedom movement was inspired by the same things. Whenever the national narratives those movements created are in conflict, books like this remind how they emerge from and create a common historical context.

Ads By Google

Message*	Maximum characters allowed

Name*		Email ID*
Subject*		Country*

TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).

I agree to the terms of use.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF LOST CHANCES