A creative tension
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- India, China have wisdom to address bounday issue: Li Keqiang
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing
In recent weeks, the simmering conflict between political and civil society has reached a fevered, and somewhat theatrical, pitch. Almost everyday, Arvind Kejriwal launches bombshells against politicians. The usually unflappable Salman Khurshid makes veiled threats against Kejriwal and Mamata Banerjee ominously promises a "counterattack" against the media. Clearly, India Against Corruption's decision to go from campaign to party has raised the stakes. But underlying this political theatre are real institutional conflicts, with both sides accusing each other of crossing the proverbial Lakshman rehka. IAC has been relentless in its portrayal of politicians as venal, immoral and self-interested, going so far as to challenge the very authority of parties to pass legislation. Though many raise doubts about IAC's tactics and broader vision, most commentators accept the diagnosis of pervasive institutional decay. The political establishment, in turn, lashes out: a cartoonist is imprisoned for mocking politicians; anti-nuclear protesters are branded stooges of the foreign hand by a minister; and NGOs and social activists complain of increasing hostility from the state. Rather than being a space of reasoned deliberation over pressing social issues, the public sphere, amplified by an increasingly sensationalistic media, has degenerated into an arena for shouting matches.
This spectacle has led many to despair that democratic politics is locked in a stalemate and is incapable of self-reform. But focusing on the conflict between an increasingly defensive political society (parties and state institutions) and an increasingly vocal and assertive civil society may be missing the larger point. First, it's important to recognise that political and civil society are almost by definition in tension, but that this can actually be healthy for democracy. Second, while civil society is neither inherently democratic nor universalising in the way its cheerleaders make it out to be, it can play a vital role in containing the excesses of political society as well as in strengthening key aspects of democratic governance.
... contd.
Please read our terms of use before posting commentsEditors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks




Ego trips
A police force of his own
A suitable CAG
The problem with porn


















