Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

A disclosure drama in a democracy

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Scene One: The Delhi High Court pronounces a judgment on February 11, 2000, directing the EC to ensure the details of pending criminal cases and the assets of candidates contesting elections are available to voters. Scene Two: Although the HC’s direction is to the EC, the Union of India (led by the NDA) chooses to file a special leave petition in the Supreme Court questioning the judgment, claiming that disclosure of background information was a legislative matter in which the judiciary had no right to interfere.

    Scene Three: The SC rejects the appeal in May making it mandatory for candidates seeking election to give their financial, criminal, and educational details. EC has up to two months to implement this.

    Scene Four: The EC issues an order implementing the judgment after consulting the government.

    Scene Five: On July 8, 2002, all 22 political parties unanimously decide that the judgment cannot be implemented and the Representation of People Act (RPA) can be amended in that very parliament session.

    Ads by Google

    Scene Six: The law ministry, very efficiently, circulates the draft of a bill to amend the RP Act on July 15, 2002. Lok Sabha is adjourned because of the petrol pump scandal and so the the bill is not introduced.

    Scene Seven: The cabinet sends a draft ordinance to the president, who returns it. The cabinet sends it back to him the next day. The president has to sign. The RP Act stands amended with effect from August 24, 2002.

    Scene Eight: Three PILs are filed in the SC challenging the ordinance’s constitutional validity. On March 13, 2003, the court declares the ordinance (now an Act) “illegal, null and void”, restoring the 2002 SC judgement.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.