Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

A double whammy

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • C. Raja Mohan

    The UPA government built upon the advances made by the NDA and completed the negotiations on the guiding principles for resolving the boundary dispute during Chinese premier Wen Jiabao’s visit to India in April 2005.

    Since then, however, the momentum of the boundary talks has slipped. If China is prepared to respond, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh should now focus on finding a mutually acceptable territorial compromise during Hu’s visit.

    For years, Chinese analysts have argued that ever since Rajiv Gandhi, India has not had governments with the strength to negotiate seriously on the boundary. Yet for the first time in decades, there appears to be a strong domestic political consensus in India for a pragmatic settlement of the boundary dispute with China.

    With the inevitable support from the Communist parties, and the blessings of Vajpayee who led creative Indian thinking on China for nearly three decades, Singh has the opportunity to pull off India’s biggest foreign policy coup in six decades. Singh has one of India’s most experienced China hands, Shiv Shankar Menon, at the helm of the foreign office. As the Americans might say, let the real bargaining begin.

    Ads by Google

    Previous123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.